went down a gintis pipeline and found this interview, really interesting progression and perspective. I think I still disagree about what he calls postmodernism (rick wolff postmodern??) and that its harmful and useless, https://t.co/8kDeaek5d1

seems to go hard on science data guy which is really good (and a breath of fresh air in econ) but still I think he undervalues less data driven things too much like philosophy or political theory. Tho its possible im misinterpreting and he strictly means like try to be impartial

while designing experiements/studies/research, in which case yeah absolutely, even if thats not completely possible. Would be interested to hear Gail's perspective on this, bc she was interested when i told her about experimental econ (social sciences need!)