.: "makes you either irrelevant electorally and only ppl that already agree, and politicians have just another axis of interests to think about. idk it doesnt seem super promising but def a lot more defendable than "fuck it dud it would look bad dont do anything""

Alt Text

Home Timeline Search

Show parent replies

View parent reply

.Nov 2, 2021

yeah this is the right critique tho, he fucked up there

.Nov 2, 2021

yea andrew and matthew (i think?) have the right take here i think

.Nov 2, 2021

the last block i think is really funny lol - big aversion to it

.Nov 2, 2021

poggers dude your quantity big at all costs im sure that will have no impact on the substance of your org lmao

.Nov 2, 2021

idk at the end of the day i dont really care about this too much, but i do think it is a good case study for seeing whether anarchists critiques hold up and i think they do lol

.Nov 2, 2021

now to be charitable if everyone had matthew and andrew's pov it would be fine? but the problem is that homogeneity is not realistic nor desirable

.@disheveled.diary.dreary.dev

makes you either irrelevant electorally and only ppl that already agree, and politicians have just another axis of interests to think about. idk it doesnt seem super promising but def a lot more defendable than "fuck it dud it would look bad dont do anything"

November 2, 2021 at 9:36 AM