live-skeeting the jargon of authenticity but shaking my head so everyone observing my spirit journey knows i disagree

retrospectively i realize this is ambivalent between me actually employing the jargon of authenticity myself and me reading adorno’s book

originally the latter was intended, i think i need to play with the different modes of identity construction a bit more

there’s something hollow and unrigorous about skipping through an important story and just extracting the conclusion. you miss all the constitutive moments and lack the experience when confronted with similar conversational patterns in the future

i can be a bad reader sometimes and it makes me a bad writer, so it’s time to turn that around