Alt Text

Show parent replies
willy gilly chapter 2. i made it though half a paragraph and im rolling my eyes already

dude who is he arguing against 馃槶馃槶馃槶馃槶 anti-humanists who are anti-truth and anti-freedom but also somehow maintain this incredibly thin moralism and strongly believe in Leftism
those people exist but like, is that really the triumph of this book? i know i know, let him cook. its just so hard
bruh im gonna crash out lmfao, why are we dragging naive second-international marxism into this?
look i kinda get it, pomos are marx-influenced and the kind in the air, especially at the time, was something more akin to that silly orthodox. like i can trace back what he's getting at, but there are so few people nowadays that like that and he's acting like its the most widespread contemporary
thing. idk we're hopping in relevance a lot by saying things like "younger generations of academics" which imply a group but is vague enough to retreat to.
maybe i'd stop getting one-guy'd if i just gave up a little more and accepted it as this very nebulous ideal-typic construction but he doesn't speak that way and is very smug about the whole thing
maybe this is the reaction some people have to nietzsche, like am i being PhilosophyTube rn? the curse of abigail thorn
bro im gonna cry, i can't even make it one sentence without triggering myself. the pro-moralist anarchists are so fucking annoying man 馃槶 waow dude tell me more how everyone evaluates things no thats super interesting