like maybe im just being incredulous or simply wasn't there for the undocumented history of this sub-culture. but this reads less like a coherent position or group of people and just disagreement with a grab-bag of tendencies on the left that don't form any coherent group at all

lol this is just the laziest, ugliest genealogical strand of ideological critique. people that don't like universalism are privileged, boom mic drop

gonna cry dude like even when we're stating a fine position (anti-anti-legibility) we're all awkward and stilted with it. like what are these random quotes. it's just so weird to see an eagleton sentence where democracy is taken for granted as good

we're so messy and all over the place, a hodge-podge of concepts and they don't paint a very pretty picture

"the nouveau riche might be crass and arrogant, and the poor - usually more tightly tied to objective materiality - might be obliged to speak plainly and directly of practical factuality, but today’s ossified and comfortable middle classes prefer indirectness."

i don't even have to say anything right