Alt Text
Show parent replies
The post below is a reply to another user
that’s a fair concern, but i’m not really sure how else to interpret the tucker. his main concern is inequality here, and is comfortable condemning everyone to wage labor (which i regard as a negative fate).
on the compensation point, it seems like he is implying that capitalists steal what rightly belongs to labor, but doesn’t posit any theory for determining what fair value could be. marx does, and i find his account convincing. ill have to check back in after Carson though
this is kinda why i cited gothacritik, since i saw parallels in tucker’s “full wages” and lassalle’s “undiminished proceeds of labor”. i imagine carson is much different than both though, given he’s writing after the marginal revolution