Alt Text

Show parent replies
marxology deep cuts with kevin carson
like i genuinely doin't know how he misses this, his own citations contain passages that would correct the misunderstanding
Rudolf Hilferding, Böhm-Bawerk's Criticism of Marx
his arguments are largely orthogonal to marx and are mostly responding to classical pol-econ or marginalists but every time he says something about marx it's just wrong
i also think its interesting that when he was establishing some central points of marx early on, he exclusively cited things written 10-20 years prior to vol1, lol
"Under capitalism, distinguished as a system of privilege from a genuine free market, ..." its embarrassing to even critique, but its astounding the extent to which lwmas rely on the shriveled philosophical notion of "privilege" as a central pillar
the load-bearing moralism on display is just kinda sad too, but i feel like i'm beating a dead horse

"from our apriori principle of human nature we derive..." oh cool so i can disregard everything you're about to say
hey look i made a political ideology political ideology or price theory with moral evaluation? ...price theory with moral evaluation