Alt Text
Show parent replies
The post below is a reply to another user
yes of course. but just pointing out the potential that someone could be influenced by their environment is not sufficient on its own. one can view the unmasked genealogy and still endorse the end result.
yes it is ‘dangerous’. but dangerous does not mean categorical opposition. the obvious move here is to flip it around and say “but aren’t there an abundance of sources encouraging me to stay unchanged?”