Alt Text

HomeTimelineSearch
Show parent replies
View parent reply
willow
wait shit i posted this next one on main instead of in the thread
willow
that's my goat 🥹
65. Here we come up against the great question that lies behind all these considerations ——For someone might object against me: "You take the easy way out! You talk about all sorts of language games, but have nowhere said what the essence of a language-game, and hence of language, is: what is common to all these activities, and what makes them into language or parts of language. So you let yourself off the very part of the investigation that once gave you yourself most headache, the part about the general form of propositions and of language." And this is true.—Instead of producing something common to all that we call language, I am saying that these phenomena have no one thing in common which makes us use the same word for all,— but that they are related to one another in many different ways. And it is because of this relationship, or these relationships, that we call them all "language". I will try to explain this.
willow
like i have my criticisms for ordinary language philosophy but tell me this doesn't go hard
109. Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of language.
willow
wait huh what happened with my blob bro
willow
i can see it on pds!! cdn me motherfucker!!
willow
wittgenstein the marxologist explaining that the money-commodity also has an exchange-value and a use-value.... waow
120. You say: the point isn't the word, but its meaning, and you think of the meaning as a thing of the same kind as the word, though also different from the word. Here the word, there the meaning. The money, and the cow that you can buy with it. (But contrast: money, and its use.)