Alt Text
Show parent replies
and like, i don’t really have the answers here because im not a great political theorist of optimal capitalist corporate structure. would it have been better to spin off protocol as a separate entity to maintain that separation (similar to original twt inception LOL)?
funding would be wacky but you could set up some split thing, tho i imagine it’d get hella complicated with funding and it’s intended purpose. i’m not really gonna pretend like i have a ton of insight in this domain so im gonna stop pontificating
this got way off track but one last thing i wanna mention is the unbelievably massive gulf between bsky and literally any other app. where like the reference appv and every other existing app arent operating at anything resembling the complexity,
and it feels like there’s a lot of underestimation of how much inside baseball benefits there are and it’s frustrating how opaque things are. zeppy is cool! but also like lowkey in ruins atm and i don’t think that’s an individual failing.
idk despite all the hemming and hawing in some corners here about power and political-adjacent theorizing, no one really has any clue what they’re talking about. which is fair on multiple grounds, and to build anything at all you kinda just have to take the leap, but at minimum
i do wish there were a more developed vision of what the path to “future enemy” looked like to these people because it’s kind of a cop out to be like “waow ya we’re gonna be so evil one day” and take no preventative measures bc you don’t understand the process.
which is again going to appear unfair bc ofc they’ve thought about it, but we needed more than dorm room speculation
shrug this is boring, gl proto
oh and last thing re:conflation of interests/success, it’s funny how that less categorical form of centralization on bsky the app leads to weird situations where the success of the app leads to direct conflict of the success of the proto. pds/client userbase and impl details have outsize influence