Alt Text
Show parent replies
i don't know why people think it's impressive to sidestep the issue of moral patienthood and jump to the moral implications of dispositions and the like. at best it's unenlightening and at worse it's offensive to the material itself
from aristotle to hume to kant to mills to williams people love trodding it out and it's just so uncompelling
"None of this is an argument about Penny being conscious, that LLMs deserve rights, or that you most definitely need to be kind to ChatGPT."
"But when you start to treat an LLM with cruelty, the only thing you're really revealing is what you have in your heart, not whether the machine has one."