right-libertarianism has similarities with anarchist communism (AC), but is even broader: while AC doesn't allow for hierarchical economic relations and won't endorse making a distinction between racial classes, right-libertarianism embraces any organizational style that is consensual, growthful, or
it's unfortunate for anti-wittgensteinian reasons: our houses are absolutely not in order and we desperately need philosophy to push onward, but instead it seems hopelessly committed to dragging us backwards with every intervention
“a great game you shouldn’t play” is about the inverse of my current approach to reading books and listening to music
“a horrible book that you should read”
i much prefer the unpragmatic utopian childish anarchists to the ones that clearly don't have their heart in it at all, and might as well be anthropologist observers. vile cowards that speak of "them" rather than "us"
book that makes me so upset i have to reactivate to talk about it
like are you kidding me what is this sentence: "It is not a question of establishing comparisons or awful cultural supremacisms but rather defending the secular, non-normative nature of the anarchist framework."
"descriptive x is good but prescriptive x is bad"
check in next week for more fantastical absurdities from people who never got the memo about the naivete of the fact-value distinction