if anything it's a release on a supervenience relation i.e. a denial of the hypostasization of identity into a supervenience relation with reality. the naive materialist inversion gets its appeal from the disruptive impact but nonetheless maintains the connection in too strict and uncontextual a way

i think the core wish is actually still understandable though, it would be a radically different culture and scheme of categorization, which would basically undermine the distinct significance and mystification of identity as such