Alt Text

HomeTimelineSearch

willow

dreary.dev

did:plc:hx53snho72xoj7zqt5uice4u

andromorphic angel

Posts (3,520)Replies (15,093)Media (2,494)Videos (110)
willow
bsky.app/profile/did:...
willowMay 26, 2025
drum pad and sticks
i was recently reminded that i’m a drummer so i bought myself a practice pad :)
willow
i was recently reminded that i’m a drummer so i bought myself a practice pad :)
drum pad and sticks
1 replies
willow
adorno, critical models: interventions and catchwords, pg. 108 Without a firmly held opinion, without hypostatizing something that is not fully known—that is, without accepting something as the truth while it is impossible to be completely certain that it is the truth—experience, indeed the very preservation of life, is hardly possible. The timid pedestrian who hesitates at the yellow light, judging that if he now crosses the street he will be hit by a car, is not completely sure that this will actually occur. The next automobile could be driven by a humane driver for once, who will not immediately step on the gas.4 But the moment the pedestrian were to rely on that and cross the street on the light he would, simply because he is no prophet, most probably be killed. In order to behave as the common sense of self-preservation dictates, the pedestrian must, as it were, exaggerate. All thinking is exaggeration, in so far as every thought that is one at all goes beyond its confirmation by the given facts. Yet this difference between thought and its factual confirmation harbors the potential for delusion as well as for truth. Delusion can then really appeal to the fact that, in general, no thought can ever be given the guaranty that the expectation it contains will not be disappointed. There are no discretely conclusive, absolutely reliable, independent criteria; the decision is taken only through a structure of complex mediations.
1 replies
willow
footnote 2 is my favorite dreary.dev/blog/reply-t...
adorno, critical models: interventions and catchwords, pg. 305-306 NINTH QUESTION: It was said that even exaggeration is a means for teaching and education. Could you explain this a bit more? PROF. ADORNO: I would like to try to forestall a misunderstanding. I would not be able to accept the responsibility for recommending exaggeration in education. On the contrary, where consciousness is so sensitive, as in these places, if someone says, say, that six million Jews were killed and not five million, then the five million wouldn’t be believed either. With this I only wanted to say, in consideration of the by no means optimistic overall picture that I gave, that I perhaps exaggerated and this exaggeration seems to me to be a necessary medium for socialtheoretical and philosophical presentation, because the moderate, normal surface existence in general conceals such potentials and because in the face of neutral, average everydayness to indicate the threat lying below it at first blush always has the character of exaggeration. I would urgently warn against exaggeration in pedagogical work, for instance. On the contrary, I would say the less the idea of propaganda here even arises, the more stringently one holds to the facts—which God knows speak for themselves, or against themselves—the better. If you will recall from the war, which I of course did not experience in Germany, the authority the BBC, the English radio, enjoyed precisely because it did not make propaganda but because one knew that it was telling the truth, then I think this expressed something very central to our problem.
Show full thread
willow
Hegel. The Difference Between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/fs/ch01.htm#:~:text=The%20Need%20of%20Philosophy When the might of union vanishes from the life of men and the antitheses lost their living connection and reciprocity and gain independence, the need of philosophy arises. From this point of view the need is contingent. But with respect to the given dichotomy the need is the necessary attempt to suspend the rigidity opposition between subjectivity and objectivity; to comprehend the achieved existence (das Gewordensein) of the intellectual and real world as a becoming. Its being as a product must be comprehended as a producing. In the infinite activity of becoming and producing, Reason has united what was sundered and it has reduced the absolute dichotomy to a relative one, one that is conditioned by the original identity. When, where and in what forms such self-reproductions of Reason occur as philosophy is contingent. This contingency must be comprehended on the basis of the Absolute positing itself as an objective totality.
willowNov 28, 2024
one of the many reasons i enjoy wittgenstein is that he articulates one elaboration of hegel's dictum: "philosophy arises when life has lost its unity" www.marxists.org/reference/ar...
willow
domino meme with soap pfp, crown peach, and minecraft guardian leading to a globe with lines to different locations
willowJan 1, 2025
did you know that the atproto friends server used to be 3 people until soap made me buy crown peach
willow
killow
chii and hideki motosuwa from chobits
1 replies
Show full thread
willow
fun fact: this track partially motivated the creation of @disheveleddiary.bsky.social
Well let me tell you this, I am shamelessly self-involved I spend hours in front of the mirror, making my hair elegantly disheveled
willow
gail didn’t understand my affinity for Admit It!! until the post-chorus
sayanything - Admit It!! https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ia7oZLWN9t4 Proud of my life and the things that I have done Proud of myself and the loner I've become You're free to whine, it will not get you far I do just fine, my car and my guitar, yeah
1 replies
willow
gorf / muen dms willow 12/1/23, 17:09 why does every girl i meet wanna pet me Marie @ara.lol 8m i like your vibe dreary @dreary.bsky.social 5m :3 Marie @ara.lol 4m ok idk why but this reply made me laugh *pet pet*
willow
nietzsche, beyond good and evil, 207 Whatever "personality" he still possesses seems to him accidental, arbitrary, or still oftener, disturbing; so much has he come to regard himself as the passage and reflection of outside forms and events. He calls up the recollection of "himself" with an effort, and not infrequently wrongly; he readily confounds himself with other persons, he makes mistakes with regard to his own needs, and here only is he unrefined and negligent. Perhaps he is troubled about the health, or the pettiness and contined atmosphere of wite and friend, or the lack of companions and society-in-deed, he sets himself to reflect on his suffering, but in vain! His thoughts already rove away to the more general case, and to-morrow he knows as little as he knew yesterday how to help himself. He does not now take himself seriously and devote time to himself: he is serene, not from lack of trouble, but from lack of capacity for grasp-ing and dealing with his trouble. The habitual complaisance with respect to all objects and experiences, the radiant and impartial hospitality with which he receives everything that comes his way, his habit of inconsiderate good-nature, of dangerous indifference as to Yea and Nay: alas! there are enough of cases in which he has to atone for these virtues of his!-and as man generally, he becomes far too easily the dead head of such virtues. Should one wish love or hatred from him - I mean love and hatred as God, woman, and animal understand them - he will do what he can, and furnish what he can. But one must not be surprised if it should not be much-if he should show himself just at this point to be false, fragile, questionable, and deteriorated. His love is constrained, his hatred is artificial, and rather something forced, a slight ostentation and exaggeration. He is only genuine so far as he can be objective; only in his serene totality is he still "nature" and "natural."
willow
If they want to live, then no other avenue remains but to adapt, submit themselves to the given conditions; they must negate precisely that autonomous subjectivity to which the idea of democracy appeals; they can preserve themselves only if they renounce their self. Those whose real powerlessness shows no sign of ceasing cannot tolerate even the semblance of what would be better; they would prefer to get rid of the obligation of autonomy, which they suspect cannot be a model for their lives, and prefer to throw themselves into the melting pot of the collective ego. adorno, critical models, 165-166
Show full thread
willow
alt text backfill
Happy Cake Day, u/ManiacMongoose 6 years on Reddit iOS notification 12m ago r/Socialism_101 u/Homosexualtigr • 1y Society is now socialist. I clock in for my job as a waiter for a restaurant. What does my day look like? Just sort of unsure as to the day to day differences under a socialist system. ManiacMongoose https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anonymous-prole-info-abolish-restaurants prole.info Abolish Restaurants a worker's critique of the food service industry
Show full thread
willow
alt text backfill (and reconnecting thread)
@pruebaprueba8142 4 hours ago how the hell did u went from breakcore to hyperpop to incelcore and now emo good music tho this is literally my pipeline 😭😭😭 youtube comment my most popular youtube videos on the DrearyWillow. channel https://youtube.com/channel/UCRkYcOnwlkH-mNWAupYb_4g Latest Popular Oldest Play all haunt - listen to this while high Paulo Freire - Pedagogy of the Oppressed (audiobook) love life all the time - Cuteness I Hate My Body! | Want To Be A Girl! - GEZEBELLE GABURGABLY nacho - i wish i could sleep forever haunt - song to keep myself from relapsing mirrormage. - risen angel current - worldwidesuperstar Andy pls - ethan come back breakcore needs you dssctveself - haunt me x3 785june - unfriended 168 The Ego and Its Own Part 1: Man (audiobook) nacho - ethereal chemdawg - FUJI SPEEDWAY (REMASTERED) arcade trauma - sleepy eyes In Our Time S12E16 - The Frankfurt School
willowAug 19, 2024
become ungovernable; post valorant clipdump montage tracks beside radical literature audiobooks, tranny music, hexd, and soundcloud drum slop
willow
mary
laid back camp manga from dinah’s bookshelf
willow
The most woke among us might say: "Are you not closer to agender or nonbinary?" But they say this without realizing that those, too, have both become genders, mostly defined by having piercings and somewhat embarrassing names. https://hepatica.srht.site/library/gender.html What is Gender?
1 replies
Show full thread
willow
https://github.com/lmangani/soundSky/blob/main/main.js#L337 } else if (mode === 'discover') { const params = { q: '#soundskyaudio', limit: 50 }; if (localCursor) params.cursor = localCursor; feed = await agent.api.app.bsky.feed.searchPosts (params) ; } else if (mode == 'search' && q != false) { // alias search on image id const params = { q: '#soundskyimg='+q, limit: 50 }; if (localCursor) params.cursor = localCursor; feed = await agent.api.app.bsky.feed.searchPosts(params);
Show full thread
willow
new orleans jailbreak fuck opso ~~i’m~~ we innocent to easy lol suck my dick o.j.c most hated catch when you can
Show full thread
willow
how it feels recreating a post in the middle of a thread and throwing the counter off
sad hobo ant guy
1 replies
willow
no better conditions for yapping than caffeine and a long drive
All Recordings trip-4-leg-2 20:50 53:29 trip-4-leg-1 17:41 2:01:28
1 replies
Show full thread
willow
yes this is a @maedasalt.bsky.social reference (at least in part)
https://soundcloud.com/maedasalt maedasalt Seattle, WA, United States 2,470 Followers - 46 Following nightcore princess since 2011. ♥ https://maedasalt.bandcamp.com/ https://x.com/maedasalt https://open.spotify.com/artist/1VeHaz98PQfoCvbckwADdk https://k7gendo.weebly.com/maedasalt.html
1 replies
willow
kasey and i got put on the same project at work
willow 17:01 it's so funny i thought there'd be like at least one more guy but nah i'm just hanging with kitty at work kasey 17:03 it's wild we can log cuddling with pods work willow 17:03 yoooii :3 kasey 17:03 team building we'll be the first ts to ever log a handjob 7091
willow
discord ui update scared me for a sec
diary > 3 members
offline - 3 dreary3 mellow2 willow
willow
Jun 15, 2022 at 15:37
willowMay 21, 2025
this album reminds me of running in the summer heat
1 replies
Show full thread
willow
alt text backfill
Self-Consumption Out of ownness, the owner consumes its properties, rendering them nothing. That is, it incorporates otherness into itself, and affirms its own power as unique. It seems as though the owner exists both outside and inside its own activity of consumption. Outside, since it exists separate from its property, consuming it as its own; inside, since the owner is not grounded by some transcendental ego, but only exists in its activity. Where, then, is the I? Is it a black hole that absorbs everything into itself? Is it a fixed point, an absolute ground, an ontological substance? "The I is not all, but destroys all," Stirner remarks. "Only the self-dissolving I, the never-being I, the-finite I is actually I."88 The actual, finite I is not a stable ground of action or consumption. Rather, it is produced through its consumption, and consumed through its production. Produced, since the I emerges out of the singular history of its own consumption. And consumed, because the I dissolves into the temporal stream of its own production. Circulating through production and consumption, Stirner's "self-dissolving I" takes on and discards multiple forms of appearance, but always circles back to the creative nothing at the center of its ownness. I. To begin from myself means owning these presuppositions of history, these conditions of what I am and what I could be, consuming them, discarding them, becoming something else. Never satisfied with one constellation of property and self, the owner consumes itself as its consumes the world. In other words, for the owner to remain its own, it must tirelessly ward off its own petrification into something alien, dead. It must dissolve itself whenever it becomes fixed in one form, one identity. That means, it must become food to itself,
In order to make sense of Stirner's unique understanding of the I, one should first differentiate it from Fichte's superficially similar use of the same term. A Fichtean interpretation of Stirner would consider the I to be a fundamental a priori principle- that from which the particular I that I am could be deduced. Stirner's "I", however, is always mine first, never transcendental. Fichte's "I" is a condition of possibility for experience as such. Stirner's I is not a pri iple or thesis in the construction of any theoretical system, but a moment in a phenomenological description of experience from the first-person singular perspectivel Although both depart from the I, Stirner a Fichte's conceptions are distinct in terms of form and function, content and method. Fichte's transcendental "I", according to Stirner, makes the same error as Feuerbach does with "humanity" and Marx does with "species-being": it imposes an ahistorical and external form on the dynamic content of my existence; it attempts to determine the essence and limits of my experience according to an identity or principle alien to me. It is, in short, an identification of the non-identical. The reasons for this are not just philosophical, but Spinoza's definition can be of great help: he singularity of a thing is not just the transposition of its singular extended body into an individual identity, rather a singular thing can be any number of individual bodies which, in one action, collectively cause a single effectl At first this seems blurred. Are we not conflating causal mo on with individual identity? In fact, that is exactly what we are doing, and it is nevertheless an incredibly
thing. Decoupling the meaning of singular from the meaning of individual shatters the conception of identity as a property of an individual. An individual does not have an identity except in its relation to a series of causes and effects which are determined by other individuals, which themselves have no identity except in their relation to a series of causes and effects, and so on ad infinitum. The identity of an individual is not then based on an internal property, but on an external relation of action and effect. How can many things be one individual, and how can many individuals be one singular thing? Through their composition in forming a single effect, whether or not their individual causes are completely different. JACOB BLUMENFELD ALL THINGS ARE NOTHING TO ME THE UNIQUE PHILOSOPHY OF MAX STIRNER zero books
willow
retvrn to 2021 willow
2021-08-11

This is a post by another user.

View in bsky.app
1 replies
willow
have a few more
2021-01-07
2020-09-23
2021-10-14
2021-10-14
willow
yeag
youtube time watched 11hr 29min daily average up 65% from last week today - 10hr 44min last 7 days - 80hr 22min
Show full thread
willow
you really enabled pvp for this one
everybody can reply
Show full thread
willow
also this was at kings college
Raymond Geuss giving a lecture "On Solidarity" at Keyne's Hall in King's College, Cambridge originally from https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:xwpapeentoankvx5z34hdbs6/post/3lcnug5aa3s2v https://imgur.com/cgOsV6y
willowDec 13, 2024
recording here :)
willow
depressed willow posts give off the vibes of this old picrew now that i have the 🩷 label
willow @dreary.dev with the 🩷 - willow label from @kickflip.renahlee.com did:plc:ubt73xes4uesthuuhbqwf37d
willowFeb 17, 2024
it’s picrew saturday bloomfies
1 replies
willow
on this episode of “marx failed to consider”
Carlo Lancellotti @_CLancellotti •1d Arguably, the real alienation people experience today is not the one Marx imagined (alienation from the fruits of one's own labor), but rather alienation from our fellow human beings due to radical non-belonging fostered by capitalist globalization. https://x.com/_clancellotti/status/1924467554552103022
1 replies
willow
marx, economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 (4) An immediate consequence of the fact that man is estranged from the product of his labor, from his life activity, from his species-being, is the estrangement of man from man. When man confronts himself, he confronts the other man. What applies to a man's relation to his work, to the product of his labor and to himself, also holds of a man's relation to the other man, and to the other man's labor and object of labor. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Economic-Philosophic-Manuscripts-1844.pdf
willow
the willow shopping experience
and she's like what's the willow shopping experience &im like oh yeah she kind of turns into a partner pokemon follower 3 ft behind u on her phone sksksksks Edited 19:18 signal dms w annie
willow
willow 9/11/23 4:35 PM Yeah, I think I'm just highly resistant to being ideologically at ease with my labor. So despite there being multiple framing options available, where one keeps their attention is highly significant, and I'd like to refrain from focusing too much on the use-values that result from my work
1 replies
willow
clocked
instagram messages from my brother (@thicc.boi.memez) You and Kasey meow at each other This is so you two coded ›start playing ff14 with brother ›playing female miquote (catgirl race) because cute ›finds me playing a catgirl cringe ›start meowing at him >he throws a fit ›do it every once in a while for a reaction >tell people at work about it >they laugh and call me a secret furry >do it to laugh with them ›weeks pass and this just becomes normal to me ›now have verbal tick where I periodically meow ›been like this for over a month Oh fuck I was only pretending to be retarded now l've caught it for real. actual4chan Anonymous 04/09/25(Wed)23:16:33 No.80928530 BRAIN PROBLEMS 21 KB JPG Average ff14 player https://www.instagram.com/p/DJoUGcdNgRG/
1 replies
Show full thread
willow
alt text backfill
blocking my lovely wife kasey @kasey.cafe chasing ghosts | she/her | ace sweetheart unorthodox individual interest promoter 106 followers 80 following 1.7k posts posts replies media feeds lists following share add to lists mute account block account report account
Show full thread
willow
alt text backfill
william james, the meaning of truth, the will to believe, is life worth living Consider a poor dog whom they are vivisecting in a laboratory. He lies strapped on a board and shrieking at his executioners, and to his own dark consciousness is literally in a sort of hell. He cannot see a single redeeming ray in the whole business; and yet all these diabolical-seeming events are often controlled by human intentions with which, if his poor benighted mind could only be made to catch a glimpse of them, all that is heroic in him would religiously acquiesce. Healing truth, relief to future sufferings of beast and man, are to be bought by them. It may be genuinely a process of redemption. Lying on his back on the board there he may be performing a function incalculably higher than any that prosperous canine life admits of; and yet, of the whole performance, this function is the one portion that must remain absolutely beyond his ken. come to what is the soul of my discourse. Religion has meant many things in human history, but when from now onward I use the word I mean to use it in the supernaturalist sense, as declaring that the so-called order of nature that constitutes this world's experience is only one portion of the total Universe, and that there stretches beyond this visible world an unseen world of which we now know nothing positive, but in its relation to which the true significance of our present mundane life consists. A man's religious faith
broad. What then do we now mean by the religious hypothesis? Science says things are; morality says some things are better than other things; and religion says essentially two things. First, she says that the best things are the more eternal things, the overlapping things, the things in the universe that throw the last stone, so to speak, and say the final word. "Perfection is eternal,"-this phrase of Charles Secrétan seems a good way of putting this first affirmation of religion, an affirmation which obviously cannot yet be verified scientifically at all. The second affirmation of religion is that we are better off even now if we believe her first affirmation to be true. 'THE TRUE, to put it very briefly, IS ONLY THE EXPEDIENT IN THE WAY OF OUR THINKING, JUST AS THE RIGHT IS ONLY THE EXPEDIENT IN THE WAY OF OUR BEHAVING. Expedient in almost any fashion, and expedient in the long run and on the whole, of course; for William James January 11, 1842 - August 26, 1910) was an American philosopher and psychologist, and the first educator to offer a psychology course in the United States. James is considered to be a leading thinker of the late 19th century, one of the most influential philosophers of the United States, and the "Father of American psychology."
willow
Raymond Geuss, "Did Williams Do Ethics?", A World Without Why, pg 181 Williams used to say that the United States was the most eighteenthcentury country in the world; it was, he thought, politically, socially, and culturally caught in a kind of time-warp, an apparently eternal present that was actually represented by some point in time in the 1790s. Williams never expatiated on what exactly he meant by this statement—­I assume that the reason for this was he thought that this was a particular kind of interpretative statement: if you did see the point of it, you required no further elaboration because it would immediately ring true to certain experiences you had had, putting them in a certain intelligible order; and if you didn’t see the point of it immediately, then no amount of further elaboration on his part would convince you. And then the statement might actually have a more potential long-term effect, if it was simply dropped so as to shatter on the floor like a huge bit of unwanted crockery and the noise was allowed to reverberate through the room sans commentaire. Presumably part of what he meant, though, was that the country had never been able to move beyond a particularly archaic form of the struggle of the Enlightenment with its enemies. Nothing after Adam Smith and Kant really survived the Middle Passage to take root on the western side of the Atlantic, so the culture was stuck in a state of trench warfare between a party that identified itself (in some way or another) with Enlightenment Reason (either through commitment to the ideal rationality of “free markets,” to technologically rational solutions to all problems, or to vapid Kantian “norms”) and an obscurantist religious fundamentalism that was all the more dark for defining itself in contrast to reason. Bernard Williams
1 replies
willow
Raymond Geuss, "Did Williams Do Ethics?", A World Without Why, pg 181 To say that the United States is an eighteenth-century country is to give a historical interpretation and perhaps also express an attitude, but it is not, of course, to make a moral judgement in the technical sense in which some have wanted to construe the term “moral judgement.” It is not to say that the population is vicious or the institutions corrupt. It is not the kind of statement one is liable to encounter in a book on “ethics” but rather the sort of thing someone like Herodotus would have said (if he had had a suitable concept of history and historical framework at his disposal). In his last book, Truth and Truthfulness, Williams tries to develop a theory about the relation between factual data and interpretation, which has always struck me as very close to the theory of the “constellation” one finds in Benjamin and Adorno. The stars that compose a constellation are physical objects of a certain kind and each has a set of empirically specifiable properties, a location in the sky, a certain relative magnitude, perhaps a colour. A constellation is not a mere collection but an organization of a set of stars into a recognizable and perhaps significant pattern: a bear, a hunter, a wagon, a set of twins. One cannot, of course, create constellations ad libitum, using stars that are not already there, putting together stars that are too far apart from the human eye to see synoptically, or creating patterns that make no sense to us. So we—and what we are, as the historically located creatures we happen to be—partly determine what constellations there can be (for us) by virtue of setting out the limits of what can make sense to us.
Raymond Geuss, "Did Williams Do Ethics?", A World Without Why, pg 182 “What can make sense to us” is neither completely pre-given nor fully indeterminate, and to the extent to which we can change it, this can be done only over time, and probably only collectively. The sheerly physical data about the distribution of stars does not require us to group them into this set of constellations rather than some other, and in fact does not require us to group them into any constellations whatever. We don’t invent or create stars by organizing them into constellations. Still—and this is the claim Adorno and Benjamin make—at any rate, in the realm of collective human action, culture, and politics, we are guided by constellations, not by the analogues of raw or theoretically manipulated astrophysical data, and there is no real alternative to that. It just is not possible to do without something like constellations. Similarly, Williams thought that there were facts that had the hard, unmalleable character we usually attribute to them and that could be discovered by “empirical” means (whatever they turn out to be). The U.S. Constitution had x-number of articles and article z was passed on such-and-such a day. On the other hand, the “positivist” dream that one could dispense with any interpretation and simply let the facts speak for themselves was just that—a dream. Similarly, no set of “facts” requires one to adopt a particular interpretation, but no interpretation that anyone would take seriously simply floats unconnectedly above the data or connects them in merely arbitrary ways.
1 replies
willow
berserk, volume 9, page 17 (chapter 37) skull knight: so the gears have indeed begun turning. guts: gears?! what's that mean?! skull knight: you, struggler. take heed. guts: struggler?
willow
we gettin rowdy
HUZZAH! GLORY BE! RE: Financial Reporting MY GOAT!!MY KING!! THANK YOU!! a buncha kaomoji outlook email
Show full thread
willow
hbd danii
https://bsky.app/profile/labeler.flicknow.xyz danii 🐇 @danii.fi with a birthday label from mark
Show full thread
willow
alt text backfill
tristam hunt, introduction to engels’ the origin of the family communist society did not include homosexuality. 4 In fact, the private Engels was something of a homophobe. In 1869, Karl Marx had sent him a copy of the German lawyer Karl Ulrich's book Argonauticus, which argued that same-sex desire was inborn, that masculinity and femininity should be regarded as a continuum, and coined the term 'Urning' to describe homosexual and lesbian attraction. Engels, revealing all of his Prussian Calvinist upbringing, was appalled by such 'unnatural revelations'. 'The paederasts are beginning to count themselves, and discover that they are a power in the state,' he wrote back to Marx in a hyperbolic, homophobic rant. Guerre aux cons, paix aus trous-de-cul [War on the cunts, peace to the arse-holes] will now be the slogan. It is a bit of luck that we, personally, are too old to have to fear that, when this party wins, we shall have to pay physical tribute to the victors ... just wait until the new North German Penal Code recognizes the droits du cul [rights of the arse-hole]; then he will operate quite differently. Then things will go badly enough for poor frontside people like us, with our childish penchant for females. 50
Show full thread
willow
alt text backfill
the incredibles teacher coincidence? i think not Dash Parr's teacher Bernie Kropp, remote control in hand, in front of security footage on a TV monday cutting
Show full thread
willow
alt text backfill
cominsitu @Cominsitu I'm not an Adornian I just think he was right about everything 14:21 • 4/16/24 cominsitu @Cominsitu Negative dialectics means solidarity with the protestors even though they were wrong, and criticism of Adorno even though he was right https://x.com/cominsitu/status/1649824272515203074
Show full thread
willow
alt text backfill
gorf Today at 1:13 AM i told yueshan how ur either gonna get fired or kys n all he said was "lol" gorf Today at 1:15 AM u still had a couple of good months but then shit really hit the fan gorf Today at 1:21 AM ur so sad to look at smh i miss old really autistic but at least was mentally here kyler cry cuz you're so worthless die without a purpose why do we do all this well, I can't tell Cuz I'm so bummed out My life's not fun now I'll just shut down Cuz I'm so bummed out I'm so bummed out Lie down forever Try but doesn't get better why am I so bitter Well I can't tell bummed out neet
Show full thread
willow
alt text backfill
THE HELL ARE YOU DOING! EH? I THOUGHT IT WOULD CALM YOU DOWN SOMEHOW... ACTUALLY, IT'S THE OPPOSITE!! IN THE FIRST PLACE, DO YOU EVEN UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE DOING!? BUT MARA-CHAN DIDN'T MIND IT, YOU KNOW? THAT IS… LIKE HELL I CARE ABOUT THAT! ANYWAY, DON'T TOUCH MY EARS ANYMORE! OTHER-WISE, IT WILL… AS I THOUGHT… WH-WHAT'S WRONG? EVER SINCE YOU TOUCHED MY EARS... Futanari no Elf (Pages 11-20) 70K views 1y ago ...more Cstuu 466 Comments 3 Next: Futanari no Elf (Pages 51-60) Futa • 14/264 Cancel Post hell yea they are florence @morallawwithin • 12h Metaphors are the enemy of reason What the hell am I doing, anyway? [i don’t remember the youtube video this is from, kasey was the recommendation] Neon Genesis Evangelion 1995 ½ whatever. Overrated as hell Azumanga Daioh 2002 5 stars HOOOLY SHIT "I’m friends with pedophiles" ChaoticRat @IrradiatedRot • 15h I'm friends with people who have attractions towards things that cannot consent but would never actually commit the act of pedophilia, Beastiality, etc. And I'm friends with people who have schizophrenia and other "not so pretty" diso... 17:49. 9/30/23 from Earth • 1,287 Views 2 Reposts 56 Likes 1 Bookmark Mojo @00OM0J0000 •12h My moot already posted this but @so_lonely I dead know hella predators but I still hang with them just to see how they mind work 7:40 PM • 2/21/23 This Tweet has been deleted
willow
What seems to me – if you will allow me to put it this way – what appears to me to be the danger in your position, in which, God knows, I cannot ignore the undercurrent of a deep despair, is this: I fear that you sometimes surrender yourself to this identification with the aggressor out of a kind of – yes, forgive me – metaphysical despair. That is to say, you theoretically identify yourself with the very power that you yourself, like all of us, fear; but in doing so you also side with a whole series of things, which I think – and which you would probably also think – are nevertheless tied to the disaster in a profound way. Adorno, "Is sociology a science of man? A dispute" Adorno and Gehlen 51:00 https://youtube.com/watch?v=pmL2eztve2Y
1 replies
Show full thread
willow
kasey tell her to get a boybortion for the cause willow 10/7/24, 12:57 you and me seeing who can outhitler the other kasey 10/7/24, 12:57 lovely reactionary couple
1
567
50