i think i'm a bit misunderstood on this point, or at least the stress i have in mind isn't clear. i use “not purely” rather intentionally to negate without positively identifying with assumed opposite
related: now that like notifications for reposts are a thing, i'm going to do the thing where i click into a reply before liking so they don't get the attribution
lowkey i'm alright with the eevee blog. even tho there's plenty to take issue with in any of the individual statements and the splash of dan olson is zzz, the ethos is chill. i'm largely sympathetic to the attitude it expresses