Alt Text

alice roberts

alice.dreary.dev

did:plc:znmktqkgqhm2twxcbqiszvx4

Artist, dog-lover, and avid reader.


ok idc im still talking about this because everyone is doing wack tech political philosophy
1 replies
paul's statement is like intensely interesting and also intensely wrong imo. i was gonna write a blog thing about this yesterday but i thought i was out of steam
https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3lbkhvrkwec2l
I tend to think of atproto as a federalist republic (like the US) and activitypub as a confederation (like the EU). Both have pros & cons, and I want both to thrive and give redundancy to each other


https://bsky.app/profile/dustyweb.bsky.social/post/3lbmkedwojs2j
I'm not so sure about this one lol, the relationship to actual literal nation-states makes me a bit uneasy especially because in OCapPub I wrote a whole section called "the nation-state'ification of the fediverse"

But it doesn't matter I get what you're going for, haha
1 replies
imo there are several overlapping concepts at play here (these are stipulated definitions, anachronistic and kinda ideal typic): federation: a group of actors organized under a central authority they comprise confederation: a group of actors comprising a common organization, crucially
1 replies
with the right to succession. "tech federation": as far as i can tell this is basically interoperability. a common communication method that actors can use to interface with one another.
1 replies
there are sub-questions here about the internal decision-making procedure of such entities. two forms this can take i think are best explained with reference to the way power is distributed to roles:
1 replies
representative: a group of actors appoint another actor to present their interests and make decisions on their behalf. delegate: the delegation i'm thinking of is informed by the social anarchist tradition. delegates are strictly mandated and instantly recallable.
1 replies
i'll let kropotkin explain strict mandates: "the delegate is not authorized to do more than explain to other delegates the considerations that have led his colleagues to their conclusion. Not being able to impose anything, he will seek an understanding and
1 replies
will return with a simple proposition which his mandatories can accept or refuse". unlike representatives, delegates do not provide their own perspective, but summarize their mandatories' collective perspective to another group of actors.
1 replies
instant recall is the enforcement mechanism to ensure this happens. if the delegate deviates from the mandatories' desires, they can be recalled and replaced with someone who can summarize their views accurately.
2 replies
ok wow thats neat alice, what the fuck. well yea idk thats what im thinking bro. literally what is anyone talking about. i glided past the tech federation thing but it has like nothing to do with anything????? i get that it's like the metaphor people use and we're kinda stuck with it, but i agree
1 replies
with christine that this is like the most absurd, incongruent, misleading set of metaphors in the world. people are not servers. in fact, people run the servers, and there are relations of power within the organizations that run them that are usually like way more important
1 replies
don't get me wrong like the ability for multiple actors (and actors can be internally organized in any number of ways) to communicate with one another is fucking awesome, and theres a ton of potential here for FOSSy shit that i'm really into
1 replies
BUT ALSO GUESS WHAT - i don't even like agree with christine because she was making a totally separate point ???? and like yea its a concern but SHES DOING THE METAPHOR THING I HATE AHHHHHH WHATS GOING ON
https://gitlab.com/spritely/ocappub/blob/master/README.org
1 replies

unironically i think arguing with randoms is a public service. to the uninitiated, it's a way to learn the protocol without reading the docs, in a casual context that is interesting (conflict)

please keep being annoying, we need you

also the tech meaning seems so thin that it’s basically worthless. like it sometimes seems like sprinkling a political flavoring on “interoperable”. in that case atproto is a federatable protocol and bsky is trivially but not meaningfully federated, which is like conceptually fine ig
1 replies
oh and i should be transparent that something akin to “credible exit” is my primary concern too, because i mostly care about my own records and could ultimately do without anyone else’s. i like that atproto is centered around an ID (and my most pressing concerns are the very real DID issues)
1 replies
i like the model of extensible lexicons a lot. i like that everything is just json. to be frank, i don’t really give that much of a fuck about the social part, outside of how it interacts with the integrity and accessibility of my records (moderation).
1 replies
so it’s kinda like yeah i hope y’all sort that relay problem out, whatever. it’s a big issue for social but tbh i don’t know how much Relay1 + Relay2 + RelayN does much to meaningfully resolve what power issues there are.
1 replies
(which is basically my problem with the multiple micro-tyranny model of “federation”, to bring this full circle)

dw you’re in good company


fwiw this is a somewhat tepid statement, and i’m less familiar with how the metaphor is used in its technical sense. and it certainly isn’t an endorsement of centralization (but this is kind of cheap bc it’s not like i have fleshed out alternative).
2 replies
criticism need not be constructive, but you probably shouldn’t be a little shit about it if you can help it and are on somewhat good terms with people with whom the criticisms are targeting

i thought i’d get an email when they approved it but nah lol, so this has been available for a bit accly

meow3 is owned by me and has like 6 ppl lol, and was my scuffed solution while expelled
1 replies

personally i would’ve just swapped back the name, but i appreciate the abundance of caution in this serious matter (who knows what other alice related bugs could have been hiding otherwise!)
https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app/pull/6005


they had to make a new category for my inexperience

grabs both the m3u8 playlists and calls getBlob on the user's PDS and you can choose which you want with -f

yt-dlp works on bsky now
1 replies







sad to see what this place is coming to… 😔 and our handles are so similar, how is anyone supposed to tell us apart?

is collusion on shinigami illegal

what the hell!! i'm way more transphobic on main!!

so for example i can unload this category of things all at once and save for later

ime yes (but thats based on vibes), tbh i prefer to manually unload anyway


critical bug in EditProfileDialog.tsx, samuel pls fix

This is a post by another user.

View in bsky.app
1 replies
i never know if it would be funnier to actually @ devs for the bit or if it would be a nuisance so i err on the side of caution

nope srru im docile woman now