being good at the humanities is brutal bc you have better values than everyone and it’s painful how moronic they all are
but then you try to do anything practical and you’re embarrassingly incompetent
and ppl will say the stuff you’re good at is “all subjective anyways hehe”
i am cursed
idk how to express this in a way that doesn't make me sound like a pseud
but like i've been thinking about how history is comprised of a series of mundane events that are retrospectively given interpretive significance.
viewing my actions in this light is devastating.
i was gonna make a shitpost along the lines of
“enough with ‘ontologically evil’, let’s try ‘epistemically evil’ for a while”
but then i realized this has already basically been done by Putnam re: Rorty
i’m feeling somewhat sympathetic for those who feel the pull of the metaphysical need. how else is one to cope with weakness in the face of monstrosity and no power to overcome the conditions this horrific world is predicated upon? for most it is too much to bear.
teaching evaluations are vile
professors are cops and therefore any positive evaluation makes you a bootlicker sellout; but negative evaluation is futile complaining to the police dep bureaucracy
in either case, you’re also just filling out a consumer survey and greasing the wheels of capital
i legit will never comprehend what goes through the mind of a 61 follower soundcloud artist that makes derivative work from already derivative work decide "ah yes today i will enclose the commons"
literally what's wrong with you
rorty says this is his favorite passage from dewey and it makes complete sense
i can appreciate it, but mostly in the sense that it makes clear where the battle lines are between the reformist and revolutionary pragmatists
"lewis once said that philosophy is a matter of gathering together our intuitions and then finding the way to keep as many as possible. i think its a matter of treating both intuitions and accusations of paradox as the voice of the past and as possible impediments to the creation of a better future"
people clown on sam harris but the moral landscape is essentially on par with the rest of the supposed groundings for ethics, albeit more clumsily presented
its interesting how much William James consistently uses money as metaphor in his writing - i'm not sure if this is a reflection of the American idioms of the day but it doesn't feel irrelevant to his thought as a whole
one of the following is true:
a) this is designed poorly
b) there is a good reason for why it was designed this way and i'm too stupid to realize it
c) it can actually do exactly what i want, i'm just too stupid to figure out how it works
reading Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature reminded me how awful philosophy of mind is
i never want to hear about c-fibers or neurological subroutine correlates ever again
those edifying philosophers with the bravery to be hermeneutic in the face of systematic epidemiologists, those will be our heroic companions while untangling ourselves from the stultifying familiarity in which we find ourselves