bro was in the grande section and i wasn’t even born

me and juliet love has no age <3

you’re just too active

depends on which side of the pond you favor

see there we go

i went through way too much effort to 100% this game

nietzsche on the pathos of distance

i’ve been increasingly frustrated today with a lack of appropriate representational object to fixate and orient around. this is the best i can do for now.

sometimes i have thoughts at 2am that are utterly undecipherable

looking into this

i would hang this up in my office but i fear it would make me cry too frequently

wow, kasey is really utilizing all of her powers and not limiting herself to domination-free conversation

me and tea

🔒🔁

oh and as a final word - the real issue is that religion in any form simply isn't a "live hypothesis" for me (to use james' jargon). that is of course unless you uses religion in the broad and empty supernatural sense that only the most ardent positivist would object instead of his other definition.

but james can't even appeal to the short term lol

nietzsche's got u covered

i mean kinda yeah

i have so many thoughts about this passage

asshole

reflection inspired by:

motherfucker

somehow it used to be closer

while we're here this will never not be funny to me

this was first messages post-stalking uwu

not me desperately composing an email tone discord message to keep contact with the most captivating person i’ve ever been around

i don’t know shit about shit

its funny that he kinda says as much but phrases it in characteristic pluralistic fashion alongside other definitions

rorty says this is his favorite passage from dewey and it makes complete sense i can appreciate it, but mostly in the sense that it makes clear where the battle lines are between the reformist and revolutionary pragmatists

@kasey.cafe talking about philosophy of math would be fun

again in my defense, this is what it looks like to run a simple cat command lmao

rorty is philosophically correct but politically wrong

its clear that he's very connected to his time and place, which is fitting for one of the founders of pragmatism i suppose, for some reason its still a little [strange? no. disappointing? no. idk] how politically moderate they all are.

the comments on my audiobook upload are hilarious

coming off the back of Rorty this comment is fascinating tbh

those edifying philosophers with the bravery to be hermeneutic in the face of systematic epidemiologists, those will be our heroic companions while untangling ourselves from the stultifying familiarity in which we find ourselves

what an odd persistent little trait, if i had to levy a conjecture i imagine it would be some sort of mangled historicist position became lodged in me in such a way that i could never convince myself that severance from ones past relations was productive, even aspirationally

so true so true

society if we let LLMs make porn and be racist

LLMs are groundbreaking, they said. a massive disruptor, they said.

forgot how bad this quiz was tho. the most egregious example being this question, which gives points for scientific socialism when you agree to something anti-marxist www.marxists.org/archive/marx...