has anyone done code comments as footnotes before

is it not intrinsically rewarding enough? you clock in for your 9-5, i do it for the love of the game. we are not the same.

new favorite soundbite

daydreaming about the walrus operator 🥰

☺️😘🥹 docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3...

tim is a cutie, i like this peps.python.org/pep-0572/#ap...

i lied i wanted music zeppelin.social/profile/did:...

she's kinda scrunkly rn but serviceable, and zeppelin link because: bsky.app/profile/did:...

🥳🥳🥳

a tad unenthused as of late

i should get more sleep

i’ve actually been a terrible feed consumer lately lol, but normally i just use list feeds for meow-meow5 plus kasey lists i did finalize standing up a personal feed gen today, but because of the aforementioned consumption disinterest i’m not keeping it actively running

i have this meme feed but erm, mind the nsfw

my currently pinned feeds have a total of 7 people in them lol (fun fact: you're one of them)

oh hey look at that

my other favorite thing about zeppelin is watching kasey try to spell it

zeppelin is poggers when the issue is bsky caching my shit

saw oomf taking the bait in ratlimit’s replies, don’t think i can look at you the same again

well i was the one cucking myself so once i stopped being stupid it all worked out =w=

done ez

alice's 800 weren't so bad, i had to get my hands dirty for main's 4k and 116k records

now to figure out why my did:web is being a hoe

you were so right for this, it was long overdue

speaking of which, you seen this? atproto-os.pages.dev github.com/atproto-os/a...

i thought it was pretty cute when i found it

tho tho tho she’s always sayin tho

the fucked up thing is that you kinda thrive in it, it’s not even like a means to an end of retirement or w/e

i think i'm a bit misunderstood on this point, or at least the stress i have in mind isn't clear. i use “not purely” rather intentionally to negate without positively identifying with assumed opposite

triangles are not my strongest shape. i kinda suck at geometry in general. the attractive part of the concept is the connections and overlap i can observe relatively independently, almost this one-sided non-dyadicism. there’s a reason i also made this post, and don’t see them as contradictory:

i’m still being confusing, so i think an example might help. i am comforted by the continual overlap in music for *o and *, despite them never being in direct contact. the affinities i note are this sprawling and blooming thing, and the density is gratifying and lovely.

i really mean to say that my loves are contextualized with all my other loves, and yes this often means i want to share those noticings and reflections with the beloveds! nonetheless there is some preferred separation there, at least for the satisfaction of this specific type of desire to flourish.

i also like “non-dyadic” because it can also imply “less than 2 (but not quite 1!)”, which fits nicely with the related schizoid-style fantasy indulgences.

sometimes i like not fleshing all this out, because i feel locked in to a specific interpretation once i articulate it, and it has the ability to imply too one-dimensional a view. but i have been leaning on that too much for quite some time, and occasionally it’s nice to put the effort in to

figure out what i mean, try to put myself together. i usually learn a lot in the process, new things come into focus, it’s then generative material to bounce off of and engage with, contrary to this (tongue-in-cheek) post:

i often don’t know what i mean yet, and sometimes it’s not the right season for me to know. but i believe my current season is one of grasping the knowledge i previously discovered

(one among many contexts, anna was more accurate to the one i had in mind at the time)

something like that

wow i misread this and thought of that one discord video where the girl sits on a monster can

ok i’ll have to find it when i get home, i haven’t looked for porn in 10 months and didn’t realize everything is unusable now

annie nooooo 🥺🥺🥺

alt text: serves u right, nicotine-addled freaks, the whole lot of you

i already quoted this in your replies before, you need new material smh

(i’m kidding, it’s always funny)