not atm but i know who to bother when i am

i don’t ! 🙋‍♀️

rapidly approaching - i can and will block them all at a moments notice

@mdma.rat.mom come look

not for willow !

anyone deleting anything online is stealing from our collective history

i could phrase this in a less inflammatory and more careful way with concepts like "discretionary power" and "deprivation" and whatnot but i essentially believe it, and i primarily have in mind individuals, tho obvi the mass extinction events are catastrophic

this is the best use of an alt account

whatcha hmmming for violet

tori no uta

activate windows

did you ever keep that up

i love you zelda

he knows what you are

oh yea i misread my meme failed this is so sad

but it’s new! as a progressive, that means i support it

hell fucking yes

could be worse

fact check: true

dibs on next

no fucking way you got the app

ohhhhhh i swapped their order on my list and confused myself

wait wtf this is so funny i didn't even realize the waiting room

gurl yours 😭

the “ok” is so fucking real omg

have you considered "woag"? i hear it works wonders

why does it hurt so much lol

immaculate vibes

it’s always auditory

that’d be cool i think, as long as it’d be stimulating enough for you 🙂

congrats!!!

in fairness a lot of people you know want to forcefem you

hopefully our side pow-wow wasn't too bad

yea and on my end i’ll say transparently that, as you know, i don’t have a wholesale blueprint, however im skeptical of the market as a mode of analysis, much less *the* mode of analysis, and am far more partial to the categorial analysis of marx when it comes to political economy

which is to say, even if market analysis can come to ‘true’ conclusions in its domain, i find it often to be asking the wrong questions (that is, perfectly serviceable in their own way, but not the most enlightening or generative way to approach a given issue).

i do admire the attempt at rigor tho and think there’s much to learn

yea i figured that’s what you’d say, i do think there’s some slippage between *market analysis* being potentially applicable in any society and markets as a central economic arrangement of the distribution of goods as evaluatively desirable

or rather historically inevitable

that’s bc you didn’t do the ancass hw and committed herself to bad things smh (mwah luvu ~)

yea that’s fine but at that point i just don’t really care anymore lmao, like we’re just doing spicy sociology i’m not strongly like grrrr markets abstractly, and i’ll continue to oppose market anarchists in practice because their ideas are more definite than just that

hm so if we did mythical warehouse communism would that count as exchange and therefore markets because objects are changing hands? like i have no issue with a stipulated definition but if we make it so thin idk how much utility there is

maybe i’m stupid but this one seems kinda confused. like it’s in the the parody section, but is talking about the benefits of network analysis, so is the author trying to say that “market” is actually referring to particular cultural characteristics?

like you and the author seem to believe it’s like a wide metaphor and sure, but then you’re doing the meme

my tl;dr take is that i’m fine with the wide view, but it seems like no matter how diffuse, it’s minimally committed to a few things i’m more critical of, particularly private property and the money-form, and likely wage labor and the law of value

real ones know: ours is a critique of forms of social mediation, not a critique of mediation from the standpoint of immediacy

we’re not maintaining the money form vro

i am loyal to my big dick princess sorry