Alt Text






uhhh... shit my bad - i mean your bad. this is your last warning or something,, (i think i'm allowed to say that right?)... anyway you're unbanned. if you could do me a favor and not tell anyone that'd be great thanks

my equivalent in the groupchat
1 replies

this is great btw, wish i had it sooner
Add all to...
on YouTube


iirc when i was first reading this book i was using microsoft edge lmao. i switched to SumatraPDF after that bc its goated, but that just has yellow. now i use okular and you can do whatever tf u want
okular highlighters

- .... . -.-- / --. --- - - .- / ... - --- .--. / -.. --- .. -. --. / - .... .. ...
racism


try reconstructionist judaism
raymond geuss, who needs a world view?, pg. 23-24
Sidney had had rabbinical training at the Jewish Theological Seminary, and had at one time been attracted by a movement called “Reconstructionist Judaism” (after the title of Dewey’s “Reconstruction in Philosophy”). This movement, which Sidney described as “50 percent Moses and 50 percent Dewey,” tried to apply pragmatism to traditional Jewish life. Allegorical or metaphorical readings of religious views are always possible, and they have historically flourished. They are also, by their very nature, difficult to control or evaluate. However, many traditional Jewish beliefs presented themselves as if they were true statements of fact, but were clearly false, if you took them that way. To say that they were “true statements of facts” was to claim that they were not just “warrantedly assertable relative to our best existing standards of enquiry,” but more than that (although the nature of the surplus [“more than”] was unclear). However, what was "warrantedly assertable” was that god did not really exist, had not made the world, had not chosen and made a covenant with the Jewish people, had not split the Red Sea, had not given Moses any commandments and so forth. However, the Reconstructionist claimed that even to ask the question whether such beliefs were “true or false” was to miss the point. What was important was that there was a body of traditional beliefs, values, and practices that “worked” for a certain community, gave meaning to their lives, contributed to social cohesion, and fostered progress in human well-being. One didn’t even have to commit oneself to saying that these beliefs were “metaphors”; it was just that they had shown themselves to be valuable and to “work” for Jews. To obsess about whether these beliefs were “true” was to remain inappropriately attached to the traditional programme of “true belief.” The continued actual flourishing of the Jewish community was all the proof one needed of their value
1 replies
(no one tell her about this part)
raymond geuss, who needs a world view?, pg. 26
It turned out not to be so, as Sidney discovered. The practices, rituals, observances, and values did give coherence, order, structure, and meaning to life, but they did so only provided that they were not explicitly seen as things to be cultivated because they gave meaning and coherence to life. In fact, if you stopped thinking they were embedded in a network of “true” beliefs (in something like the traditional sense of “true”), they lost their power to create or even retain meaning. The practices couldn’t maintain themselves autonomously, without appeal to Truth, but that is what pragmatism would have required. If the congregation did not believe in the Truth of some claims, the practices simply failed to function/work effectively as cement for solidarity and meaningfulness, and as lubricant for smooth interaction. So the more that Sidney explained that Jewish beliefs about Moses, Sinai, the Parting of the Red Sea, and so forth were not true (in the traditional sense)—although they were “pragmatically valuable”—and that to expect more was a mistake, the smaller his congregation got. William James spoke of the “will to believe” as operating in cases of religious belief, but here there seems to be something even more archaic, like a “need” of the kind discussed by Feuerbach and Marx:26 It is as if the members of Sidney’s congregation “needed” traditional truth. This, of course, leaves open the question whether they “needed” it in the way in which all humans need water in order to survive or in the way in which a drug addict “needs” his next dose.


BUT ALSO GUESS WHAT - i don't even like agree with christine because she was making a totally separate point ???? and like yea its a concern but SHES DOING THE METAPHOR THING I HATE AHHHHHH WHATS GOING ON
https://gitlab.com/spritely/ocappub/blob/master/README.org
1 replies

paul's statement is like intensely interesting and also intensely wrong imo. i was gonna write a blog thing about this yesterday but i thought i was out of steam
https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3lbkhvrkwec2l
I tend to think of atproto as a federalist republic (like the US) and activitypub as a confederation (like the EU). Both have pros & cons, and I want both to thrive and give redundancy to each other


https://bsky.app/profile/dustyweb.bsky.social/post/3lbmkedwojs2j
I'm not so sure about this one lol, the relationship to actual literal nation-states makes me a bit uneasy especially because in OCapPub I wrote a whole section called "the nation-state'ification of the fediverse"

But it doesn't matter I get what you're going for, haha
1 replies


it’s scuffed that i can get notifs while signed out so i might temp delete the app since i don’t wanna deactivate again

this is the realest shit destiny has ever done
Rose 07/07/2022 5:43 pm
Did anything specific happen that made you want to try the plug?
Destiny 07/07/2022 5:43 pm
Was just home masturbating thinking about sucking on a guy and I decided to try it
Rose 07/07/2022 5:43 pm
Where did you get it from?
Destiny 07/07/2022 5:44 pm
It's Melina's lol




when i’m in a misrepresenting the alternative competition and my opponent is a mastodon user

ok but have you considered
pr . ..
..etty.. .

post a you from a different era
me

This is a post by another user.

View in bsky.app
1 replies

flirting with her on teams
1 replies

right above this is: (lol,lmao)
2 replies
“i like your vibe” and it’s a cannon event



the above summary leaves out some juicy lore, like the time emma got brain worms about kasey


there was genuine discourse tangential to this the other day and i had to stop myself from yapping
personally idc abt alienating men, transmascs, straight women, bisexuals, other androphilics, etc if they're wrong

all the good men didn't necessarily transition into women, but they certainly didn't stay men

also look it’s u in my manga
devilman grimoire vol 1 pg 17


fuck off
LinkedIn
3 profile views
You’re getting noticed

contexterino (not quoting bc i am a coward and just want a quick dunk)
1 replies


i know this isn’t the context nor the point you’re making but it reminds me of a passage that lives rent free in my head
mute compulsion, soren mau 183-184
1 replies




hey i’ve got one of those
meow5

am confusion i don't see how that helps me identify the element consistently - like one of these? (this example is easier because it happens to be the only div in the nav but in the general case that's not super sturdy, same with nth-child or whatever)
#root > div > div > div > div > div > nav > div > button {
background-color: var(--theme-pink) !important;
}

#root nav > div > button {
background-color: var(--theme-pink) !important;
}

oh neat that's just text hanging out inside a div raw


hey frontend bsky team i love the work you do but can i start a petition to burn the guy at the stake doing this
1 replies

in case you thought i was kidding about stalking goeo (these are from the day i joined bsky)
1 replies