found a new contender for dumbest possible guy

is the “choose who can reply” thing readily publically viewable

before now, text was only appending to the status box once all processes were complete, entirely defeating the point

learned how to use PySide6 today

lol it took me forever to write so little but i had a great time :3

wrong unfortunately

edge

like i genuinely doin't know how he misses this, his own citations contain passages that would correct the misunderstanding

lmao i'm gonna scream

bro how he’s like always harping on that shit it’s like a main theme in his more determinist moods

i’ve got a guy

me appropriately responding to someone truama dumping according to the cultural mores of our time:

monogomoids are so painfully stupid and even ostensibly (progressive, radical, queer, take your pick) are afflicted with terminal adhesion to patriarchal liberalism, infecting every nook and cranny of their existential character with the rule of Freedom, Equality, Property and Bentham.

lmao wtf @borealgoth.net has this hanging up in her office at work …. she’s so cool

i never choke, shes my princess 5ever

lol, lmao

gotta love the footnote ratio

damn she was just here and then poof bye bye cya later jules

fellas, get yourself a girl like this

it’s difficult to convey in few words but for example here is harvey’s mapping of the argument in capital. it’s not intended to be syllogistic in a way that would make a non-continental happy

oh yeah btw this was the piece in particular that inspired the lukacs comment things like centralization being more efficient are basically incidental and discardable theses in marx’s work, the central thing is his method of analyzing social totality.

yeah i’m hopeful for it though also worried it will use the crude understanding of LTV (which granted, i’d wager most marxists operate under) if i’m being precise marx has a value theory of labor rather than an LTV, isn’t interested in creating a price theory, and decries “fairness” as moralism

this is kinda why i cited gothacritik, since i saw parallels in tucker’s “full wages” and lassalle’s “undiminished proceeds of labor”. i imagine carson is much different than both though, given he’s writing after the marginal revolution

“Not to abolish wages, but to make every man dependent upon wages and to secure to every man his whole wages is the aim of Anarchistic Socialism.” • universal proletarianization ._. • equality is a worthless political goal • laborers’ wages are already the full value of their labor-power

how many times do we have to teach you this lesson, old man?

lol turns out i had his page bookmarked in 2022 i'm so lazy lmao

i want out

lol holy shit wait twitter knew

yea of course, happens all the time

(in case it’s hard to read)

my bad

holy shit @borealgoth.net is nietzsche confirmed

i need to get around to more mutualist stuff i’ve had in my backlog for years but same as you i’ve slowed down a lot also when i read them sometimes it makes me soy out lol

babe you can't expose me like that

i’m literally your #1 fan this is awesome

WAIT U REMOVED LUA FROM UR BIO

you have earned my lifelong devotion

ily juli

marxist feminists waste their time talking about “reproductive labor” instead of heeding Mao’s wisdom that the inherent ingenuity, insight, and power of the masses of proletarians will always surpass that of the intelligentsia. behold:

us (we)

#DJMEOWSEER SEER 2022 TWERK MUSIC HYPER JERSEY CLUB MIX

l m a o