good point

graber

zzz

from the vault

i clicked on this expecting to experience joy.

pikachu shocked face

the citation that springs to mind is Democracy and Education, Chapter 19: "Labor and Leisure"

non-spotify user swag

statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged

must be hard to be a cult leader

everything my friend

*simple* file transfer protocol (mediated through Kafkaesque horrors beyond human comprehension, despite being their own creation)

you didn't ask but here's some Geuss Justice resources if you're interested: Politics and Architecture in "A World Without Why" (starting Pg 156) has a good typology of justice. History and Illusion in Politics is his most systematic view of the central concepts in contemporary political theory.

so close!!!!

retweet to scare a math major

lol yea i typed this 3 hours ago but didn’t send

surprisingly, no good results

bro 😭

me rn

back on my bullshit

honestly hobbes is more enlightening than most feminists (re: consent but also in general)

/j

finished, and it sucks

tim dowdall, max stirner and nihilism, pg 34 Dowdall is basically just summarizing Charles Seife’s Zero by the looks of it

these are my colonial administrators bro 😭

@kasey.cafe westerners hysterically denying the existence of the concept of zero is so funny how did i not realize this was a thing

yea absolutely i am

@kasey.cafe us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us us u-

you contain multitudes

behold: the recent addition i rarely use

sorry i didn’t see your post this is the only feed i use

will vary historically and contextually but basically a subaltern class in patriarchy comprised of young people that are not full persons. typically they are legally disadvantaged and subject to the arbitrary discretionary power of adults. lil unrelated but some distinguish kid from child

me experiencing the wonders of nature:

my liberals focusing on power: "sure this discredits most of our historical theorizing, but we still have legitimacy" (the legitimacy is justifying to liberals that they are treating non-liberals with liberal values)

reading matt sleat and i'm prepared to be obnoxiously nitpicky the whole way through ex: sleat attributes too much intentionality to geuss here. G has stated repeatedly that he made a massive mistake using 'realism' to denote anti wishful thinking, and does not have much respect for IR realism

i'm too tired to keep reading tonight but tomorrow i get the pay-off chapter: can our hero matt save liberalism? things are looking grim indeed for the poor chap.