my real take is that it’s mostly boring standard radslop, the things that are good seem kinda incidental. they’re like things you should read to be properly contextualized, but not like “wow this is so inspiring”. and a lot of stuff i would just ignore entirely
history & illusion in politics, pg 155-156
bsky.app/profile/did:...
footnote: of course this is just a metaphor for interdisciplinary proficiency and interpersonal admirability, i have no deifying delusions here. i'm quite aware this is a predominant tension, for her more than most others.
(which, to be extra charitable to op, is their point. but yknow, good luck with your "strategy and tactics" practicism without understanding anything)
adorno problems of moral philosophy 3-5
not to be an insufferable enby but i think the referential distance of people frequently using “willow” rather than pronouns or directly addressing me is cool and it’s neat that it’s arisen without my suggestion