Alt Text


you can and i’m glad you did :3

raccoon with frizz
willow-chan


you would’ve loved old willow

i thought i was a solid bottom-right quadrant but list amendments can be made at the request of VIPs such as yourself

you two are definitely on the list we just had some queue-cutting attempts

hey u deleted what the hell T-T 10/10 would lesbian kiss to this

oh sweet then bigsky it is


what’s it take for a girl to get a youtube link nowadays


i was hoping you wouldn’t validate and id get a lesbian kiss anyway


why would you do anything other than millipds+cerulea hosted on the fridge laptop? amateurs.

i ate and showered and laundry’d and cleaned and then napped
1 replies
i wish things moved just a bit slower and that i could evade the real world in your arms for a little while longer
1 replies
i have approximately 7 of you in mind as the subject of this skeet

oh i forgot to eat
1 replies
i also forgot my laundry

looking at code i wrote last night and i must have been really tired because i wrote half in snake case and half in camel case


i'm sorry to hear that




you are flawed, but you'll be fine.
1 replies
"you've been different, when's the last time you were happy?" right now :D "how much of myself can i keep to myself?" hopefully nothing at all <3 "you're so distant, can you say that you've been happy?" YES!!!

not a quantum ppl but in general i think it’s philosophical import has been way overplayed. the whole cluster of traditional free will/determinism/necessary/contingent questions are kinda the wrong ones to be answering anyways
raymond geuss, morality, culture, and history, 195. nietzsche and morality

Nietzsche's view here is like the one I ascribe to him about free will/determinism. It isn't so much that he thinks historical events are 'contingent' in some positive sense, but that the distinction 'contingent/necessary' is useless in the study of history. Since nineteenth-century philosophers of history stress 'necessity' it is convenient in exposition to emphasize 'contingency' but actually I think Nietzsche would prefer to avoid the distinction altogether.
1 replies
(i know the quoted doesn’t really back up my claim more than just being another assertion of it, but it’s intended to really just be a broad gesture at a body of work and way of thinking about the question rather than a pithy one shot answer). to hopefully be a little more fleshed out tho:
raymond geuss, outside ethics, 54

Nietzsche, then, thinks he has found a naturalistic replacement for the traditional ethical perspective and its questions, although, in my view, this naturalistic view is one centered not, as is usually thought, around the concept of "will-to-power" but around that of admiration. His view of humans, that is, takes them as standing at the intersection of certain forces and powers operating in the world —some of them operating on humans, and some through them—on the one hand, and, on the other, certain human reactions of admiration and contempt. Forms of morality are congealed and focused structures of human admiration and contempt.
It is important to see that Nietzsche does not first accept the central ethical question "What ought I to do?" and then go on to say, for instance, that each individual should perfect himself or herself, or maximally develop his or her will-to-power, or attain the highest possible self-aggrandizement. Rather he rejects the whole question on a number of grounds. First of all, asking the question presupposes that the agent, "Ego," is confronted with a decision in which there are a number of different possible alternatives between which Ego is free to choose. Nietzsche rejects the claim that this is in any sense the usual situation in which human agents find themselves. It is not useful to think of people as having a categorically free will (or a will that is in bondage). The whole dichotomy "free will/will-in-bondage" is a false one. People have wills that differ in their degrees of strength. Some have a strong will; others have
raymond geuss, outside ethics, 55

a relatively weak will.3s If you are the right kind of person, one who has a strong will, you will not be terribly concerned with the question of what you ought to do. You will, to be sure, be looking for objects of appropriate commitment (Hingebung, Bindung), but that is just a fact about how a person like you is liable to feel the need to act, and the search on which you embark will be for something which you judge to be worth admiring. Such a search, how-ever, has a completely different structure from that into what anyone "ought" to do. Also, if you are another kind of person—a kind of person Nietzsche does not admire and who has a weak will—asking the question what you ought to do will generally be pointless, because if you are weak there will be no significantly different alternatives open to you anyway, none, that is, that makes any real difference, just as for a certain kind of traditional Christian, a person in a state of sin does not have any freedom worth the name. A sinner can choose X or Y, but from the definitive religious perspective they will just be different versions of sin. Freedom to choose one sin rather than another is utterly unimportant, or rather it is a way in which an especially deep form of human bondage plays itself out. Nietzsche's own positive use of the term
"amor fati" to describe a kind of character which he admires is an expression of this. To love one's fate is not something one ought to do, but something people sufficiently admirable will in fact do, and others will not be able to do, and in that ability and inability will lie the grounds for admiring them or despising them.


can’t believe you turned me into this

jkjk srry emma it is really gross im sorry ppl are like that


going feral snarling back and forth with shreyan,,

people should be nicer to zoos like u :(

we both know that doesn't really end in anything viable

god i wanna BITE

good good pat pat pat nini dahlia

he's pretty primo ngl, you two would have very fun arguments


it’s actually a mystery 😭


lol i redownloaded to check
my bumble bio

Bio
Write a fun and punchy intro.
hikikomori wannabe. into anime, linux, political theory, music. dreary.neocities.org
Gender
Nonbinary 
Pronouns
Be you on Bumble and pick your pronouns.
he/him
she/her
they/them

2022 might have been worse lol, i got stood up for a museum date after reading her favorite manga and i couldn’t top a guy because he was way more masc so we got drunk and i watched him smoke a cigar instead

this is so stupid, i snorted laughing fuck you