it’d be like a vanilla cishet guy reading omegaverse smut because he thought for some reason it held significant philosophical value
like yeah it’s cringe the whole time but eventually you just accept it as genre convention and can let your eyes glaze over for those parts
it’s amateurishly written, poorly formatted, and ofc the analysis is lacking in explicit systemiticity (something you’ll have to get used to if you read most anarchists) but the ethos is correct and it covers all the main points (incl. criticisms of friere and the like, albeit sloppily) so its chill
as an alternative to “read a curriculum of graduate education theory / history of western philosophy, but like, yknow, disagree with all of it but use it as a backdrop to take away my idiosyncratic views” it’s serviceable lol
as in (it’s a delicate process that’s probably not worth it, but also yknow is just wacky enough of an experience that it might inspire something down the line)
doubt
at least in canada they’ll be like ooo i’m gonna dump syrup over you and i’m not even gonna say sOorrey
what’s france got on that? methinks it all a bluff