gentleman, gentlewomen, and genbies

never thought i’d see the day where we’re having zasulich letter discourse on main, genuinely kinda awesome

its usage has always been a little funny and a little cope-coded but honestly it’s just further indication that marx had rather distinct moods but not the typical stagist temporal development ascribed to other writers (early/middle/late) or an epistemological break

others are right to point out his repetition of the thesis elsewhere, those drafts are just the clearest and most dedicated development. still, i think it’s fair to admit the humorous appearance of desperation

to some extent i think it’s reasonable (even rational? though not Rational) to resist or reject that which is historically progressive

particularly if you are still under the spell of the spirit of the harm principle and like most people nowadays can’t muster a strong defense for domain or agent isolation of harms

not to mention the methodological inadmissibility of prospective applications but tbh i’m tempted to let this slide on grounds of prudence and contextual differences in purpose; truth isn’t always the telos (hence “epistemic” inaptness) and sometimes a predictive just-so story is what is needed

anti-working class marxism remains one-sided in its basic proclamations, but it’s basically perpetually the correct response to the impoverished theoretical state of would-be radicals

rejoinders are ready but the moment is so brutally neglected it feels hopelessly premature to give an inkling of ceded ground, for risk of misinterpretation

the constant handwringing of “well under capitalism…” as if that exonerates the proles from playing their part in its perpetuation

like ya i wont lie i dont really fw the take but the moral pride of the underdog is ideological yet again, who knew

ig another way of putting it is that there is a separation between class interest qua class constituent (class in-itself) vs class interest qua class as such (class for-itself) - sure, the conditions of emancipation for proles as class puts them in a revolutionary universalist role, but narrowly

there is no such requirement and, despite appearances, sympathy for their direct woes is basically just picking a pet team in an capital-reproductive internal dispute. the economic anxieties are real but expressions of such are no more revolutionary than capitalist complaints of a tight labor market

on the lowkes i pirate then add the game to steam and run w proton anyway

hot girl aura loss when she thought deleuze was a part of the frankfurt school and that adorno was a postmodernist

its easy to make piano arrangements too staccato

its up to the player to make it flow

rests are powerful, their inadvertent use can be unfortunate

sometimes im too clever for my own good and it’s awkward 😭

“do u sing?” “i scream! and i like your cat aesthetic” *says something autistic about kittencore and she doesn’t know what it is* fml

re:

kasey does functional attraction and i do object oriented attraction

(we are both narcissists)

wait this is actually super comforting

i like when my hair goes in my face

i'm lonely and i don't want anyone to know it

my sex is bouba

boys' love

i have complicated feelings about annie-style (the other one) micrological joys and i’d like to flesh them out when i’m in a better headspace

i’ve been crying a lot

you’re sweet for taking care of me

i’m unwilling to take a position on whether we thrive in silence but i am willing to say that i wouldn’t be pleasant right now

skipping my meeting and going on a walk, fuck you all

now is the time i’d record something for juliet if i wasn’t so tired of my voice and the venom on my lips

so instead it’s time to listen to shitty angry music

outsourcing the emotions i can’t bring myself to feel

where is this poor girls advisor

i think i’m gonna be sensitive and bitter until end of year

instead of feature adoption 5 year plan we should have a performance 5 year plan, this is fucking unacceptable

sorry i’m sensitive and bitter today

some days catching on e.h. does not spark joy

everyone ignores em when she says shit like this because if they didn’t the conversation would be over

bring back the phrase “running dogs of imperialism”

i’ve made my own position abundantly clear

i’m a pissy whiny irritable baby

i’m peeved

which is not to say he neglects it by any means, it features prominently and often all over the place, but typically role-based relationships (parental/familial, economic) and in discussions or virtues and their lack

i feel like it’s anthropological significant and revealing more than anything