some times u have to realize ur being murray bookchin and stop urself

"i'm not an anarchist i'm a social ecologist" man shut up

also tho some anarchists' takeaway from him being wrong about lifestylism is that they can clear their consciences and be proudly useless which, erm

i'm not saying you should be useful (i don't know how either) but at least exercise a bit of shame about it

check this out

they should verify em

it'll happen when they bless fastpay :trogi:

right-libertarianism has similarities with anarchist communism (AC), but is even broader: while AC doesn't allow for hierarchical economic relations and won't endorse making a distinction between racial classes, right-libertarianism embraces any organizational style that is consensual, growthful, or

oh okay we're just saying shit now

this is what "non-normativity" gets you, dumbasses!

yea i dont actually rely on it either i just thought it'd be funny to say lol

get with the times old man, we've moved on to lists obfuscated via labeler

i am deeply unimpressed by hypocrisy

like, as used as an unmasking device. it's just weak and pathetic and weird. people will say internal criticism but that has a much different moral tone

"i am differently abled" ok

i should start reading goebbels so i can have things to talk about with my metamours

update: i got supremely bored with the nazi shit and gave up

it's unfortunate for anti-wittgensteinian reasons: our houses are absolutely not in order and we desperately need philosophy to push onward, but instead it seems hopelessly committed to dragging us backwards with every intervention

or at least, this is a call to action for a new wittgenstein to set us straight so we can throw away the ladder, but that seems rather optimistic

🤮

its kinda unfortunate when our practitioners are more insightful than our theorists

you're looking absolutely spectral this evening

we can make one more crystal castles kept remix

no sorry, it's too late for that

disillusion?? i was using that??

“a great game you shouldn’t play” is about the inverse of my current approach to reading books and listening to music “a horrible book that you should read”

“gay science” no kidding

“autonomy” is nauseating

i don’t know why i quote some things rather than facing the concept straight on

maybe it’s optimistic that a satisfactory account could be mustered someday. “autonomy” is “what is called autonomy”

it’s also just like unbelievably lazy. show not tell girliepop, or at least show before telling the implications of what has been shown

they should make a feminist philosophy where they talk about the topics of feminist philosophy without feeling obligated to be feminists

There is a contradiction built into the very idea of art - art must be a failure because it tries to do something that can't be done with the means it is committed to trying to use (if it wishes to remain art).

i’m not very interested in marxism right now

marxist humanism always held a soft spot for me because i thought it most adequately captured what marx himself was after, in a “most frequently returned” theme sense

make some unnerving assumptions, see where they take you. i just don’t have the imagination or patience these days

why is the bibliography to my book more interesting than the book itself wtf

i've already split off on a few diatribes to read other articles, anything to liberate myself from this drek

boundaries and consent, how daring

i hope you never feel like changing your display name

INSANE AURA

unpragmatic + utopian + childish are not to be regarded with begrudging toleration, they are our only hope

i much prefer the unpragmatic utopian childish anarchists to the ones that clearly don't have their heart in it at all, and might as well be anthropologist observers. vile cowards that speak of "them" rather than "us"

judith suissa and juan carlos perez cortes spring to mind

book that makes me so upset i have to reactivate to talk about it like are you kidding me what is this sentence: "It is not a question of establishing comparisons or awful cultural supremacisms but rather defending the secular, non-normative nature of the anarchist framework."

"secular, non-normative" oh so you're like incredibly stupid

so true bestie you can accomplish everything you want without contrasting at all and without evaluation in any way (which would be hierarchical and authoritarian) begging and pleading radicals to read one page of nietzsche