a rhetorical move i dislike is one that essentially says anarchism implies lack of evaluation, that it’s authoritarian to not tolerate differences of opinion. when ig they really mean to say that the evaluation in question is not all that significant, because obviously they have their own limits

and like, usually they’re wrong that the evaluation is inconsequential or irrelevant or (even worse) private

this is not to endorse its opposite obvi, public accountability of all thoughts and deeds blegh

ugh i do not like this uncomfortable anxiety, i feel the pressure of your attention and it’s bothersome

i don’t want to be the same me all the time everywhere

we need more neoliberal communist liztopians

taro dot dreary dot dev

i'm in the happiness and joy cluster

it’s okay i’m patient, i’ll see u when i see u :)

YES PLEASE

i was such an idiot like 3 months ago, even moreso 3 years ago

for clarity’s sake, i was very naive in my understanding of human motivations and was doing a lot of counter-moralizing

probably necessary to get comfortable in my own skin to an extent, but let’s just say i’m grateful i was a bit of a recluse so no one had to be exposed to my first attempts at flight

i should have brought a blankie

i like that adorno is of the position that animals can perform value-producing labor

“censorious, hyper-moralistic, identity-crazed, monocultural”

dismay for the positions available to us

the fact that a liberal could make those accusations and have relatively secure ground to stand on is an anathema

😭😭😭 i am so unattracted to you

problematic iq gap

lock in pup, there’s capital to valorize

my twt is awesome

???

unfortunately also poor sociologists of religion too

classical anarchists are pretty poor philosophers of religion

(i am reading proudhon)

i don't think i'm old enough yet for the pregnancy

i recalled being a lot more bothered by it last time actually

desire satisfaction theory deserves more consideration from the continental and psychoanalytic traditions

really just because they are the most equipped to provide an internal critique

nana really has only gotten better as i age

you know hachi, i still believe that life is what we make of it. but now, i'm able to recognize that not everyone can be strong all of the time. because of that, i've grown much kinder than i used to be.

eh im dull rn

just like from a user experience pov, the blacksky pds kinda blows ngl. high/inconsistent latency (intermittent so it’s not just distance) and sometimes it just becomes unusable for a while

gentleman, gentlewomen, and genbies

that cuts off too much and makes it sound like genuine enbies and ironically is too curt to actually evoke gentleness

never thought i’d see the day where we’re having zasulich letter discourse on main, genuinely kinda awesome

its usage has always been a little funny and a little cope-coded but honestly it’s just further indication that marx had rather distinct moods but not the typical stagist temporal development ascribed to other writers (early/middle/late) or an epistemological break

others are right to point out his repetition of the thesis elsewhere, those drafts are just the clearest and most dedicated development. still, i think it’s fair to admit the humorous appearance of desperation

to some extent i think it’s reasonable (even rational? though not Rational) to resist or reject that which is historically progressive

particularly if you are still under the spell of the spirit of the harm principle and like most people nowadays can’t muster a strong defense for domain or agent isolation of harms

not to mention the methodological inadmissibility of prospective applications but tbh i’m tempted to let this slide on grounds of prudence and contextual differences in purpose; truth isn’t always the telos (hence “epistemic” inaptness) and sometimes a predictive just-so story is what is needed

anti-working class marxism remains one-sided in its basic proclamations, but it’s basically perpetually the correct response to the impoverished theoretical state of would-be radicals

rejoinders are ready but the moment is so brutally neglected it feels hopelessly premature to give an inkling of ceded ground, for risk of misinterpretation

like ya i wont lie i dont really fw the take but the moral pride of the underdog is ideological yet again, who knew

ig another way of putting it is that there is a separation between class interest qua class constituent (class in-itself) vs class interest qua class as such (class for-itself) - sure, the conditions of emancipation for proles as class puts them in a revolutionary universalist role, but narrowly

there is no such requirement and, despite appearances, sympathy for their direct woes is basically just picking a pet team in an capital-reproductive internal dispute. the economic anxieties are real but expressions of such are no more revolutionary than capitalist complaints of a tight labor market