Alt Text

willow

dreary.dev

did:plc:hx53snho72xoj7zqt5uice4u

andromorphic angel



you couldn't misgender me


WAIT LMFAO I FUCKED UP THE MEME - LABOR IS LITERALLY THE SOURCE OF ALL VALUE, LABOR IS NOT THE SOURCE OF ALL WEALTH
1 replies
FUUUUUUUCK I EVEN HAVE A POST FOR THIS TOO
Gotha posting has caused a shift from people confusing wealth as value to value as wealth lmao
https://x.com/PoliticsWillow/status/1710124310080233593
https://x.com/I_____amakiwi/status/1709991405387399584

this, too, is stolen content that lives in my head rent free (now deleted but i never forget)
screenshot of my twitter archive, containing the post in question

https://x.com/PoliticsWillow/status/1791057179367104532
https://x.com/gracecthdralprk/status/1790775716159619395
https://x.com/PoliticsWillow/status/1593343522790309890
https://x.com/bermanite

Your archive includes all the account data created up to the moment it was generated.
Date generated·December 23, 2024 at 3:29:47 PM GMT-6·Estimated size·152 MB
Home
Account
Tweets
Likes
Direct Messages
Safety
Personalization
Ads
Lists
Moments
Tweets
Tweets
Replies
Retweets
Community Tweets
Willow @PoliticsWillow May 16, 2024
RT @gracecthdralprk
: Arguing with a normal left guy: you are Adolf Hitler
Arguing with a leftcom: you are Siegfried Meisterbürgeresser (obs…
ID1791057179367104532
View on Twitter
Willow @PoliticsWillow Nov 17, 2022
RT @bermanite
: leftcom accounts on their way to make a snarky critique of the gotha program joke when a dsa type says "labor is the source…
ID1593343522790309890
View on Twitter

it's kinda hot when you put it like that


my take is that goeo is still right about everything and that it doesn’t have to be discouraging to anyone doing hot girl shit ya feel
1 replies
ppl should take gooey more seriously even if u think they’re annoying or w/e
1 replies

also i won’t be this greedy but image alt text is valid (and displayed in social-app) beyond 2k but not indexed for searching
1 replies
i just love misusing accessibility features
1 replies
oh yea also if you do support gifs there are gonna be a billion results for “alt” for every user lol


not-so-sneakily adding ?kawaii=true to my pdsls links to infect your settings

53:55 mega banger: here’s what i really need: i need to join someone’s polycule but like kinda have it be like, “oh yeah willows in there but kind of in name only, like they’re listed on the lease but they’re never around”

thinking about brujules with these, revisiting with new associations is always revelatory
2 replies
it’s a good triplet of diaries, a nice reflective gap period between eras


yea immediately after this i recorded a voice memo where i said “i lied i know exactly why i don’t like it” lol

when they hit they hit yknow

dw i do it all the time shamelessly

This is a post by another user.

View in bsky.app

i follow you because you come here to cry before falling asleep and tolerate you being pretty

my hair dries in fun ways
curls

alt text backfill
raymond geuss, history and illusion in politics, pg. 126

This last point about the distinction between the merely instrumentally good and that which is inherently or categorically or absolutely good in itself marks a watershed in political thought which has not, I think, received the attention it descrves. Kant, Max Weber, and Habermas think that this distinction is sharp, and designates a basic and ineluctable feature of human thought and experience. Hegel, Marx, Dewey, and Adorno, on the other hand, think that the distinction is relative and contextual, and that it is a sure sign of a deliciency in a society if this distinction is given too much prominence or taken too seriously. For Marx and Dewey, the distinction is a remnant of a primitive state of society in which slaves did the instrumentally necessary work, and parasitic aristocrats pursued the good for its own sake. The distinction between means and ends, things good in themselves and good for something else, intrinsically good and good for its consequences, or inherent and instrumental value is a distinction one can perfectly well make within and relative to a certain established context of thought or action, but it is neither a fundamental nor an absolute distinction. What is a means in one context, may be an end in another, and in many spheres, especially those in which human activity is freest, the distinction will have only whimsical application. The members of a non-demoralised orchestra may make their living by playing so that to some extent they play for the sake of the money they earn, but the music they make may also have inherent value for them. In a fully developed and free human socicty most human action would be performed both because of the good effects or consequences it would have and because it was experienced as good 'in itself' by the agent.
John Dewey, Democracy and Education, pg. 266

Chapter Nineteen: Labor and Leisure, The Origin of the Opposition.

The isolation of aims and values which we have been considering leads to opposition between them. Probably the most deep-seated antithesis which has shown itself in educational history is that between education in preparation for useful labor and education for a life of leisure. The bare terms "useful labor" and "leisure" confirm the statement already made that the segregation and conflict of values are not self-inclosed, but reflect a division within social life. Were the two functions of gaining a livelihood by work and enjoying in a cultivated way the opportunities of leisure, distributed equally among the different members of a community, it would not occur to any one that there was any conflict of educational agencies and aims involved. It would be self-evident that the question was how education could contribute most effectively to both. And while it might be found that some materials of instruction chiefly accomplished one result and other subject matter the other, it would be evident that care must be taken to secure as much overlapping as conditions permit; that is, the education which had leisure more directly in view should indirectly reinforce as much as possible the efficiency and the enjoyment of work, while that aiming at the latter should produce habits of emotion and intellect which would procure a worthy cultivation of leisure. These general considerations are amply borne out by the historical development of educational philosophy. The separation of liberal education from professional and industrial education goes back to the time of the Greeks, and was formulated expressly on the basis of a division of classes into those who had to labor for a living and those who were relieved from this necessity.
adorno, minima moralia § 84

Timetable . - Few things separate more profoundly the mode of life befitting an intellectual from that of the bourgeois than the fact that the former acknowledges no alternative between work and recreation. Work that need not, to satisfy reality, first inflict on the subject all the evil that it is afterwards to inflict on others, is pleasure even in its despairing effort. Its freedom is the same as that which bourgeois society reserves exclusively for relaxation and, by this regimentation, at once revokes. Conversely, anyone who knows freedom finds all the amusements tolerated by this society unbearable, and apart from his work, which admittedly includes what the bourgeois relegate to non-working hours as 'culture', has no taste for substitute pleasures. Work while you work, play while you play - this is a basic rule of repressive self-discipline. The parents for whom it was a matter of prestige that their children should bring home good reports, were the least disposed to let them read too long in the evening, or make what they took to be any kind of intellectual over-exertion. Through their folly spoke the genius of their class. The doctrine inculcated since Aristotle that moderation is the virtue appropriate to reasonable people, is among other things an attempt to found so securely the socially necessary division of man into functions independent of each other, that it occurs to none of these functions to cross over to the others and remind each other of man. But one could no more imagine Nietzsche in an office, with a secretary minding the telephone in an anteroom, at his desk until five o'clock, than playing golf after the day's work was done. Only a cunning intertwining of pleasure and work leaves real experience still open, under the pressure of society. Such experience is less and less tolerated. Even the so-called intellectual professions are being deprived, through their growing resemblance to business, of all joy.
Atomization is advancing not only between men, but within each individual, between the spheres of his life. No fulfilment may be attached to work, which would otherwise lose its functional modesty in the totality of purposes, no spark of reflection is allowed to fall into leisure time, since it might otherwise leap across to the workaday world and set it on fire. While in their structure work and amusement are becoming increasingly alike, they are at the same time being divided ever more rigorously by invisible demarcation lines. Joy and mind have been expelled equally from both. In each, blank-faced seriousness and pseudo-activity hold sway.

The conception that liberal education, adapted to men in the latter class, is intrinsically higher than the servile training given to the latter class reflected the fact that one class was free and the other servile in its social status. The latter class labored not only for its own subsistence, but also for the means



i love this, it makes me feel donkey kong country ost vibes

i weigh more than i ever have and it makes me kinda uncomfy
1 replies

the masculine urge to rain walk
willow in the rain
1 replies
the pics don’t do it justice but i assure you it is very wet

creating a kuba-style like stats site with zeppelin queries just to fuck with futur

i hear they were so grateful for atcute they couldn’t help but honor her



stop buggin mary gods like hella chill