reading Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature reminded me how awful philosophy of mind is i never want to hear about c-fibers or neurological subroutine correlates ever again

imo the book gets much more compelling as it goes on (it gets less tied down to the analytic over time, but still, the time spent in its presence is dull)

if i had a vore fetish i'd be so happy rn

i can only hope that after the great cannibalization of humanity, my fangirls are a representative sample of the population at large so that we can maintain agriculture after the non-fan stock has dried up as a food source

unfortunately my marketing manager tells me i'm not terribly popular with their kind, something about inducing an allergic reaction in those with testosterone?

those edifying philosophers with the bravery to be hermeneutic in the face of systematic epidemiologists, those will be our heroic companions while untangling ourselves from the stultifying familiarity in which we find ourselves

oh my god i fucking love you

one million is too many fangirls what will i do with all this attention

autistics are predisposed to admire brechtian estrangement because it has the potential to resonate with their daily experience

the familiar is strange, some need more help seeing that than others

^-^ glad u think so and yea its all nonsense anywayz owo

sometimes i think that i am no longer as impressed with geuss as i once was, and then i read him again and fall in love all over again to repeat a sentiment i had in an entirely different context: "i doubt i really ever 'get over' anyone, i just get distracted"

what an odd persistent little trait, if i had to levy a conjecture i imagine it would be some sort of mangled historicist position became lodged in me in such a way that i could never convince myself that severance from ones past relations was productive, even aspirationally

perhaps more peculiar is not that the fact that i am unconvinced of the relevance of the notion, but rather that i am recurrently disrupted by it despite its apparent shortcomings.

something like Truth or morality that is so much of the air we breathe, fills a multiplicity of social purposes, that simply untethering oneself purely ideationally is a fool's errand. i'm skeptical of this answer considering how much more muted a case can be made for 'getting over'.

nevertheless, i've previously attempted to deconstruct the notion into constituent functions and components, in hopes of dispensing with the vestigial and retaining the vital. this project failed, likely due to to my own ineptitude, but it also now strikes me as wrongheaded, or at least incomplete.

i ought to have been pursuing creative alternative ways of thinking about my relation to the past, and seeking out admirable instantiations of enlightenment. of course there is still time for this, although the issue isn't as pressing now as it was previously for me.

in the interest of brevity, Freire really could have trimmed this paragraph down to “Their ideal is to be men.”

so true so true

🙈 i’m sorry my gremlin and i invaded your replies, it will happen again <3

i’m running on like 4 cumulative hours of the worst sleep of my life i have no charm receptors active

it’s all boring and i’m embarrassed in front of raizel

👍

uh oh she’s talking to herself again, hallucinating events. impressive that you can fabricate images though, you’re a more powerful model than i thought

aha! the ai is hallucinating, the kasey character canonically doesn’t have friends. checkmate, you damn machines will never fool us humans

that’s exactly what a p-zombie would say, nice try

society if we let LLMs make porn and be racist

we’re all npc’s from the perspective of gpt5, knower of all things

no, literally everyone involved is an npc

LMFAOOO

athenian femboy little caesar’s kasey would make me say “no out out-pizzas the hut”

you’re my widdle baby boywife srry

(look it was originally gonna be her slotted in there [because she is a minor] but you’re more chill with the boygendering so you had to take the mantle instead)

nope sorry, boy you would give me the ick

the odyssey, deleted chapter: achilles got the ick from the lad and only fucked tgirls from then on

genuinely tho i do think the trend is a positive in many respects, opening up a space for guys to be more experimental with their presentation in a safe way, given the whole thing is cloaked in irony. very frequently they express serious sentiments of enjoying their appearance

ofc there are a billion problematic things that come along with it, but it’s a neat phenomenon that is emblematic of and a contribution to widening gender norms within patriarchy and i think that’s neat and cute in a relative sense

the only person i’m a pederast for is jules, lightt is a man

all boys should be forced to do a maid cosplay stream as a rite of passage

before joining the ranks of the oppressor class you are obligated to look cute at least once

LLMs are groundbreaking, they said. a massive disruptor, they said.

it's impressive how it repeatedly got every possible detail wrong in increasingly insulting ways

today felt like the bullet hell okay but like a turn based bullet hell because i have an email job look there were just a lot of emails okay hey my life is hard why are you laughing

lowkey tho it was a little fun juggling 5 issues at a time while my inbox filled up with 10 more (it was only fun because i happened to be competent enough to eventually answer all of them)

i really am out here sending ^-^ to grown ass 45yo men in Teams

girls when they’re the same person

forgot how bad this quiz was tho. the most egregious example being this question, which gives points for scientific socialism when you agree to something anti-marxist www.marxists.org/archive/marx...

tfw you find out no romance

tfw you find out your moot believes in the romantic/platonic distinction