monogomoids are so painfully stupid and even ostensibly (progressive, radical, queer, take your pick) are afflicted with terminal adhesion to patriarchal liberalism, infecting every nook and cranny of their existential character with the rule of Freedom, Equality, Property and Bentham.
“if she’s not willing to change when you’re her boyfriend, do you really think she’s going to change for you when she’s your wife? probably not because then she has collateral too”
bro i can’t 😭
“Not to abolish wages, but to make every man dependent upon wages and to secure to every man his whole wages is the aim of Anarchistic Socialism.”
• universal proletarianization ._.
• equality is a worthless political goal
• laborers’ wages are already the full value of their labor-power
to date the most sense i can make out of the left wing market anarchist position is that they deeply care about interpersonal domination, but are not interested at all in abstract social domination. i wonder if anyone from the c4ss crowd has written anything on (post-)postone thought
i like to keep it on the down low but... being exposed to destiny was probably the biggest cannon moment of my life.
as a minor example, he's the reason i majored in philosophy/economics/political science. lol.
marxist feminists waste their time talking about “reproductive labor” instead of heeding Mao’s wisdom that the inherent ingenuity, insight, and power of the masses of proletarians will always surpass that of the intelligentsia. behold:
I think I'm just a Rock Chick... and.. I like to rock oüt, I like to throw shit around, I like to go nuts... I like to scream, I like to howl, I like to break things, I like to yell... I like to get my anger oüt... and you know what?... Everyone has their on opinion on.. everybody...
ignoring the punchline, i think this has lines of latent potential of making the familiar strange in a way i can appreciate
autists 🤝 crazymaking abusers 🤝 estrangement effect enjoyers 🤝 “customize your commitments” relationship anarchists
the naturalization of “legal name” by giving it the moniker of simply “name”, and the implied artificiality of “preferred name” is profoundly idealogical
perception by another is usually predicated upon at least some minimally voluntative aspect (even if that amounts to no more than mere toleration or teeth-gritting acquiescence in service of some instrumental end)
had a jewish studies professor and one time she off-handedly mentioned that homosexuality was a racialized category for nazis and that blew my mind.
i never asked her for some reading on the subject but i think she had in mind William Spurlin's Lost Intimacies. can't find a pdf tho :(