i wonder if there’s any good feminist literature on pragmatism and sympathy

what i have in mind specifically is the circumstance where a problematic situation arises for person A that doesn’t have any grip on person B and how they can navigate that

at least in my experience, sometimes the most beneficial thing person B can do is express their disinterest bluntly, in a way that snaps person A out of their self-importance and rumination, thereby inducing a reframing. that doesn’t always work tho and it’s risky

problematic situations by their nature of not necessarily arriving at solutions (as i’ve said before i like “compromises”) are somewhat likely to recur after dissolving, and the interpersonal affects that gives rise to are really thorny

rephrasing of the above: you had worked through an issue previously to a stable enough place to where it’s no longer a direct pressing concern in your life, but then it comes back, maybe in a modified form. there’s no reason the past method of handling it will be adequate this time, so it’s not

prolepsis is bad for one’s health

me, being confident wrong: 😼 kasey, full of shame for being associated with me: 🙈

grime grime grime

gotta solve this issue in an hour and then i’m free

unfortunately i went to the dave ramsey school of issue prioritization and now my family is destitute

(the joke is that dave ramsey recommends paying off your lowest amount debts first for the behavioral benefits, rather than the more rational method of paying off highest interest debt first. and i worked my smaller issues first but now i have to do the one that’s actually due today)

it makes perfect sense that aurora hates riotlinguist/narcissus, they’re doing like opposite things

unfortunately i’m more hegelian than miss sedimented geist and i’ve aufhebened their positions

when are we gonna kill jampants

cute hair ties

i’m a wifeguy

HR1 antifan

all my orgs are like immigrants and queers dude zzzz

no one gives a shit and it’s frustrating

got they/them’d in the feedback, funny

idk if i give they/them vibes lol

watching thought bat on mutualism and the contractarianism at its root is interesting to see so explicitly followed to its conclusion and yet remain unargued for

very particular and (suspiciously) familiar implicit notion of autonomy

when kasey and i retire and our kids move out we’re gonna record a possessed skeleton video of our own

this unintentionally sounds sexual

lynn,,, need u

mod drama aint that deep its just too much volume with a splash of self-preservation

it's for the users own good and if it isn't it's for the greater good of bluesky's success and if they have different interests than the protocol more broadly then you can credibly exit to your own pds with your data backed up in a neat format

lmao i just realized kasey is my only moot to have read marx

“why do i hate everyone’s takes” oh yea

hm almost surely a waste of time but fuck it we ball, probably one of those lessons you have to bash into your skull until you stop forgetting

i got plenty of weekends left to live, what’s another tally to the dustbin

creative misinterpretations have their limits, sometimes it’s just all-too-optimistic self-delusion

spurred on by geuss x williams ofc, thinkin derrida but also utiopian delusion and nietzsche

there is no sense in forming a consensus with the bourgeoisie and condemning their activities from proletarian point of view. it is enough to recognize their futility and to look for more effective ways to overcome the ever-present capitalist terror by the class actions of the proletariat.

mattick skrrt skrrrt

when i grow up im gonna be a council com

i look around sometimes and hang out with people and they're just kinda “what does proper cultivation of and engagement with a decentralized social web look like? who whom? norms, governance, strategic actions?” i'm just like, dude, oh my god, can we talk about the concepts you’re using?

yasa is such a good account

sometimes i do have substantive takes but as a second-order matter i think its fun that the things that interest me are second-order

big day for paternalism and discretionary power and trust

also interest and ideology !

means and ends, means and ends

hehe yep was writing a clarification as you posted

to be more specific i don’t think there’s much of a viable alternative, just degrees of applicability. they kinda demand more elaboration, and it’s mainly bothersome when they’re used in misshapen syllogisms. don’t give them a bad name, they’re necessary normative furniture bro!

context for chat iep.utm.edu/thick-co/

i assume most of what i posted was unmaintained lol

suppose i misread the prompt