omg omg this is so cute :3 i hope you get together

my amb ts sent the gc “slay sis”so i’m kinda in the opposite camp

no they were quite nice hehe

yooo i’m always saying this

who up insourcing they goeoview

i’m glad someone cares about our HIPPA rights 🦛

sounds fake, get DOGE’d

i looked it up to confirm the spelling, saw it was split up for no reason, and committed to removing the bullshit

this is how americans optimized all those extra british vowels

honestly the culdesac isn’t even the most disreputable part of the story (we moved to get into a more white school district)

this isn’t even a clever read of the situation. the old district said they didn’t have enough white kids and rejected the transfer request, so my parents just white flighted

it’s not my fault!! surprisingly my parents did not take the 5 year olds real estate opinions seriously

how would you feel if i told you i grew up on a culdesac

… woah

i once disingenuously cited this before on here to protect myself with distance, but that’s because i was leaning on the weakest element: the relationship distinction (which, in fairness to N, is applicable to the vast majority; the problem was with my usage, not his writing).

i was too much of a coward to keep this up the other day

mature, calm, possessionless companionship composed of strong self-concepts

i’m allowed to think about her for a little while longer

i cry a lot more now, you all just mean so much to me

fact check: true

ncs wanna hold hands and get you to 99 >.<

i just don’t do drugs or get in legal trouble

this happened to me yesterday and then went away after a bit, idk

:3 yayyyy congrats 🥳

ren was a rly good friend (2021 btw)

fascinating willow, tell me more

one more for the history books

hmmm unclear, leaning towards necessary so that you can outsource your emotions and assign them social reproduction tasks

grind ladder, vod review (yourself and pros), scrim 4 hours a day, neglect ur gf, have no other interests or hobbies worked for me 👍

this is such a good thread (pretty sure i'm replying to dead julie alt)

luvma kasey

exactly babe you got it

sucker for curls sorry

ooooh pretty

oh btw ren is a smol lil latina chick so she's allowed to say problematic things like this

never forget, i used to be dogshit at overwatch

i did get a little better tho

yea but thats like hella gay bro

is there a good way to reconstruct a thread with deleted nodes

current workaround: look up posts from involved users around the date of the thread

fwiw i can't really explicate my reasoning with any degree of satisfactory determinacy to skeptical interrogation either (see: prxr meltdown arc) like i can retrospectively evaluate certain things as desirable but the motivation is kinda just fickle and nebulous and that's honestly fine

like shrug who gaf

It would not be surprising if the discipline of “philosophy” depended for its continuing vitality on the tension between its different poles - between interest in the structure of the natural world, interest in forms of argumentation, and interest in “what would be for the best”.

I strongly suspect that a radical dissociation of these interests has already occurred, and the discipline of philosophy in its present configuration is held together only by a combination of historical inertia and a sentimentalized attachment to a mostly illusory image of a glorious past.

Once a unity like “philosophy” gets itself established, especially institutionally established, there is an almost irresistible tendency to find or create a single unitary genealogy for the enterprise, which means both a unitary history and a unitary, noncontextual goal.

There is a compulsion to make up a single rationale and project it back onto people who are then retrospectively declared to be “precursors.” Raymond Geuss, "Goals, Origins, Disciplines" in A World Without Why

i mean in the "criticism" didn't always carry the negative connotation and before meant something like "analysis". when kant wrote the "critique of pure reason" he wasn't like "boo! reason!"