it makes sense that market anarchists typically just reduce themselves to sniveling moralists at the end of the day
they want to prescribe a change in the superstructure without a clue why it’s developed that way, and the only explanation is Evil and Vice
if copyright were abolished then of course you’d be correct that imposing any limitation would be asinine.
in the same way that if capitalism were abolished one could no longer be a class traitor, because there would be no class to betray.
we’re not starting from a blank slate.
class interest doesn’t exist if i don’t look at it
anarchism is when i scab at the picket line
collective action is a spook
genuinely don’t know what you mean by this
From the start, whatever happiness is intermittently tolerated or granted by the existing entirety bears the marks of its own particularity. To this day, all happiness is a pledge of what has not yet been, and the belief in its imminence obstructs its becoming.
The only responsible option is to deny oneself the ideological misuse of one’s own existence, and as for the rest, to behave in private as modestly, inconspicuously and unpretentiously as required, not for reasons of good upbringing,
The goal of the well-integrated personality is objectionable because it expects the individual to establish an equilibrium between conflicting forces, which does not obtain in existing society. Nor should it, because these forces are not of equal moral merit.