Alt Text


what was i doing on twitter in 2022 dude
Mar 27, 2022
View on Twitter
GRRRRRRRRRRR WOOF WOOF BARK BARK ARF BARK GRRRR WOOF SNARL HSSSS GRRRR WOOF WOOF BARK ARF GRRRR HSSSS WOOF WOOF BARK ARF GRRRRR HSSSSS BARK ARF GRRRR WOOF WOOF BARK GRRR SNARL ARF WOOF BARK ARF SNARL HSSSSSS
Mar 27, 2022, 7:21 PM
Ngl if you were here rn I would pick you up and slowly get your back against the wall legs wrapped around me and make out with you then start kissing your neck slowly so you can enjoy ever little second then I would make my way down even slower and start giving you hickies on your chest and kissing your chest and slowly make eye contact with you while doing so then I would lay you on your back and mark up your thighs with hickies and taking my time going up and up your thighs I would tease your pussy while you feel my warm breath hitting it kissing around it and then start to eat you out until your legs start to tighten around my head and you hold my head in and with every second of pleasure you would breathe a little harder I would eat you out till your legs start shaking slightly more by the second and you cum in my mouth but I would keep going so you can enjoy it more and more while you moan my name then i would slowly tease your pussy with my tongue so you know who’s it is :pleading_face::point_right_tone3::point_left_tone3:
Mar 27, 2022, 7:22 PM
ok you win
Mar 27, 2022, 7:23 PM
@ashhotbuns
1 replies
this was our first and only interaction




alt text backfill
adorno, aesthetic theory, 39-40

Whoever concretely enjoys artworks is a philistine; he is convicted by expressions like "a feast for the ears." Yet if the last traces of pleasure were extirpated, the question of what artworks are for would be an
embarrassment. Actually, the more they are understood, the less they are enjoyed. Formerly, even the traditional attitude to the artwork, if it was to be absolutely relevant to the work, was that of admiration that the works exist as they do in themselves and not for the sake of the observer. What opened up to, and overpowered, the beholder was their truth, which as in works of Kafka's type outweighs every other element. They were not a higher order of amusement. The relation to art was not that of its physical devouring; on the contrary, the beholder disappeared into the material; this is even more so in modern works that shoot toward the viewer as on occasion a locomotive does in a film. Ask a musician if the music is a pleasure, the reply is likely to be as in the American joke of the grimacing cellist under Toscanini-"I just hate music." For him who has a genuine relation to art, in which he himself vanishes, art is not an object; deprivation of art would be unbearable for him, yet he does not consider individual works sources of joy. Incontestably, no one would devote himself to art without—as the bourgeois put it-getting something out of it; yet this is not true in the sense that a balance sheet could be drawn up: "heard the Ninth Symphony tonight, enjoyed myself so and so much" even though such feeble-mindedness has by now established itself as common sense. The bourgeois want art voluptuous and life ascetic; the reverse would be better.
adorno, aesthetic theory, 69

By an inherent tendency, important artworks annihilate everything of their own time that does not achieve their standard. Rancor is therefore one of the reasons why so many of the cultured oppose radical modern art: The murderous historical force of the modern is equated with the disintegration of all that to which the proprietors of culture despairingly cling. Modern art is questionable not when it goes too far—as the cliché runs but when it does not go far enough, which is the point at which works falter out of a lack of internal consistency. Only works that expose themselves to every risk have the chance of living on, not those that out of fear of the ephemeral cast their lot with the past.
adorno, aesthetic theory, 46

Those who have been duped by the culture industry and are eager for its commodities were never familiar with art: They are therefore able to perceive art's inadequacy to the present life process of society though not society's own untruth more unobstructedly than do those who still remember what an artwork once was.
They push for the deaestheticization of art. 4 Its unmistakable symptom is the passion to touch everything, to allow no work to be what it is, to dress it up, to narrow its distance from its viewer. The humiliating difference between art and the life people lead, and in which they do not want to be bothered because they could not bear it otherwise, must be made to disappear: This is the subjective basis for classifying art among the consumer goods under the control of vested interests.
adorno, aesthetic theory, 76

To survive reality at its most extreme and grim, artworks that do not want to sell themselves as consolation must equate themselves with that reality. Radical art today is synonymous with dark art; its primary color is black. Much contemporary production is irrelevant because it takes no note of this and childishly delights in color. The ideal of blackness with regard to content is one of the deepest impulses of abstraction. It may well be that the current trifling with sound and color effects is a reaction to the impoverishment entailed by the ideal of black; perhaps art will one day be able to abolish this axiom without self-betrayal, which is what Brecht may have sensed when he wrote: "What times are these, when /to speak of trees is almost a crime / because it passes in silence over such infamy!

alt text backfill
adorno, aesthetic theory, pg 24

This binds art to a naiveté of a second order: the uncertainty over what purpose it serves. It is uncertain whether art is still possible; whether, with its complete emancipation, it did not sever its own preconditions. This question is kindled by art's own past. Artworks detach themselves from the empirical world and bring forth another world, one opposed to the empirical world as if this other world too were an autonomous entity. Thus, however tragic they appear, artworks tend a priori toward affirmation. The clichés of art's reconciling glow enfolding the world are repugnant not only because they parody the emphatic concept of art with its bourgeois version and class it among those Sunday institutions that provide solace. These cliches rub against the wound that art itself bears. As a result of its inevitable withdrawal from theology, from the unqualified claim to the truth of salvation, a secularization without which art would never have developed, art is condemned to provide the world as it exists with a consolation that -shorn of any hope of a world beyond-strengthens the spell of that from which the autonomy of art wants to free itself. The principle of autonomy is itself suspect of giving consolation: By undertaking to posit totality out of itself, whole and self-encompassing, this image is transferred to the world in which art exists and that engenders it. By virtue of its rejection of the empirical world a rejection that inheres in art's concept and thus is no mere escape, but a law immanent to it-art sanctions the primacy of reality. In a work dedicated to the praise of art, Helmut Kuhn warranted that art's each and every work is a paean.'
continued. 

His thesis would be true, were it meant critically. In the face of the abnormity into which reality is developing, art's inescapable affirmative essence has become insufferable. Art must turn against itself, in opposition to its own concept, and thus become uncertain of itself right into its innermost fiber. Yet art is not to be dismissed simply by its abstract negation. By attacking what seemed to be its foundation throughout the whole of its tradition, art has been qualitatively transformed; it itself becomes qualitatively other. It can do this because through the ages by means of its form, art has turned against the status quo and what merely exists just as much as it has come to its aid by giving form to its elements. Art can no more be reduced to the general formula of consolation than to its opposite.



idk how you consistently find the most dumb people on bsky
1 replies
aly did u know that not reposting someone is algorithm manipulation because they are less likely to appear in discover

i revisited nurture a few weeks ago and i completely forgot how great it was

i used to feel a lot more comforted and relaxed by my apartment. nowadays it's very unsettling and alien
1 replies
i've never been at home in my home, but it's quite a bit worse now.

are you getting drunk tonight



lol ur fine, we’re just memeing

lol yeah that’s why it’s funny to joke abt :3


hey it’s not my fault your mask is boring, pick a better one :3

bzzzzt it’s awesome :3


⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡ ⸜(。˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝♡

sure that’s fine, i still like u lots ( ੭ ˘ ³˘)੭‎°。⋆♡‧₊˚

ok so shockingly, excel doesn’t play nice with 58 million lines

i have an officemate who’s on a call
1 replies
LOL this is the most cursed replacement for waow chat
1 replies
KASEY I HAVE A MEETING IN 4 MINS
1 replies
ok i have to drop ily kasey ily juli ily char ily goeo ily anna

haha i’m at work and i need to copy it into an excel table so..
1 replies
it’s a custom toolkit template lol this is not gonna automate easy mr goeo

about to open a 20gb txt file wish me luck

@vanilla.bun.how i can’t respond to you until later today, my discord is still restricted 😭 ilu waaa

it’s so awesome how the most hype generated for accessibility features is to use them in ways hostile to accessibility
1 replies
my favorite part was when she’s like “oh yeah and just go in there and delete the auto-generated captions” like do you hear yourself 😭

last night i had the idea to continually add tallies to this thread as i felt impressed by my friends, but then i realized that happens way too frequently to make any sense like i would have added d and h tallies already even though it was sleeping and they didn’t even do anything concrete :3

yes very much so. ofc i think this, ofc it’s contextual, as you say above, and as my fav author never ceases to harp on too. idk i think maybe you misunderstand me or what i am doing when i type things like the above
1 replies
this diary thread was not the final word on my past actions. it was one moment of reflection, one contributing voice to a chorus of other perspectives. the reason this one was written down is that i felt the need to develop it in a particular way that required sustained reflection.
1 replies
i have the other perspectives in relatively clear view, and i think about them often. i don’t just want to change or escape the past. im not running away from myself. i’m not motivated by fear or disgust of an old me.
1 replies
but i also don’t think the only change i have in my sights is killing off the critical parts, so that only self-affirmation remains. so you’re right on that front that we aren’t the same. most of the time i don’t have specific goals or even think in terms of “improvement” or whatever.
1 replies
i have fun wearing a lot of different masks, and it feels like you sometimes latch onto one of the masks speaking and interpret that as binding truth. but idk at the end of the day it doesn’t really matter. it’s fine if you don’t want to meet or don’t want to talk.
1 replies
i’m kind of tired of saying “it’s just a misunderstanding”, but it’s hard when you’re saying thing i don’t disagree with and phrasing them as reasons for leaving.
1 replies
and again this thread was from 2021, and my perspective may have shifted in lots of ways since then. i would definitely write something different now, and ofc that’s the point - i was writing to myself to help me deal with the situation. the function here is pragmatic, not metaphysical evaluation.
1 replies
it’s fun to be an asshole, but it’s only fun if it’s fun. sometimes it’s not fun, and sometimes the most livening approach is to try out other masks. turning away is of course a fine option as well, but sometimes that’s just a waste.



quoisexual flag moment kasey
pdsls with edit button highlighted and 3 question marks


disabling haptics still keeps the buzz when refreshing feeds