Timeline - Replies (page 311)

lmao wtf @borealgoth.net has this hanging up in her office at work …. she’s so cool

in case you wanna read this edition (Nov 1894): libcom.org/article/libe...

files.libcom.org

juli i don’t think you know what fumbled means

i never choke, shes my princess 5ever

media.tenor.com

Anime Gifs To Communicate GIF

ALT: Anime Gifs To Communicate GIF

it’s really problematic and ableist that you can’t put tone indicators in file names

i suppose it’s just redundant index.html /pos .bashrc /r main.py /neg

twitter autoscroll video is such a bad feature you’ll watch a police shooting and then suddenly an earrape meme video autoplays

most of these are just hallucinations as far as i can tell but some are pretty funny

aToJ is the only fully functional joke but “recycles adorno’s ideas” made me giggle

at times?? constantly you aspie freak (/pos)

:c i’m sorry, that’s rlly uncomfy prxr will fight the haters with me don’t you worry >:3 but /gen i will contribute to fansly redistribution efforts if you go through with it

unmediated directly social labor revolutionary jules does it again, magnificent praxis madam

(it is actually mediated but nonetheless it would actually be ‘unproductive’ labor in the marxist sense [well, depending on the particulars, there could still be valorization and capital accumulation, but there’s no way my neet jules would stoop so low] which is great news!)

W soap!!!

if you had a fansly i would pay, not to view lewd images but as a money laundering scheme

paresh im ngl bro you're doing a video essay plot summary rn. we've all read marx homie get on with it

lol, lmao

socialism and commodity production, chattopadhyay, pg45

decentralized monetary policy call it the confederal reserve

crypto bros dont flame me i have no idea what im talking about

gotta love the footnote ratio

socialism and commodity production, paresh chattopadhyay

damn she was just here and then poof bye bye cya later jules

fellas, get yourself a girl like this

This is a post by another user.

View in bsky.app

as much as i adore the idea of having an archive of our conversations, i think the record would reflect poorly on me as a partner

artisans prolly

left wing market anarchists 🤝 marxist leninists "socialist commodity production"

theacheron.medium.com

How “Socialist” Can Commodity Production Really Get?

Commodity Production has been a hot topic in Marxist debates in the last century. This article serves to clarify its meaning, role and…

The obscure man falsely attributes to me the view that “the surplus-value produced by the workers alone remains, in an unwarranted manner, in the hands of the capitalist entrepreneurs”.

In fact I say the exact opposite: that the production of commodities must necessarily become “capitalist” production of commodities at a certain point, and that according to the law of value governing it, the “surplus-value” rightfully belongs to the capitalist and not the worker.

marxists.org

Economic Manuscripts: Marx's Notes on Adolph Wagner German and English

yea this is what i mean when i say the disagreement is philosophical, because marx’s method, following hegel, is not about asserting axioms and seeing what follows in classic logical form. he has a historical dialectical method aimed at analyzing one form of social totality.

there were a group called analytical marxists that tried to reduce him to that, but i don’t regard their work positively at all and throw away what is essential in marx.

it’s difficult to convey in few words but for example here is harvey’s mapping of the argument in capital. it’s not intended to be syllogistic in a way that would make a non-continental happy

oh yeah btw this was the piece in particular that inspired the lukacs comment things like centralization being more efficient are basically incidental and discardable theses in marx’s work, the central thing is his method of analyzing social totality.

also i wish more of them would read lukacs (at the very least “what is orthodox marxism?”) the strawmanning and lazy disregarding is a bit nauseating

which is why it feels so premature for miroslav to proclaim that we’ve moved beyond marxism without engaging philosophically and rather merely empirically

oh yeah i read those first i actually liked the earlier stuff a bit more :P lotta the c4ss stuff i either didn’t need convincing of or i had no stake in tho lol

i will say that’s the fun part about reading lwmas - going from things i take to be obvious truisms to the most backwards thing i’ve ever heard back and forth lol it’s fun

i think i can be excessively agreeable in my communication sometimes, in an obfuscatory way

“how can you be sure you’re a woman?” oh, you know, i’m a conflict avoidant little bitch

hehe dw i won’t be too disappointed, im having a good time either way. and to be clear its not all bad, i am an anarchist after all and im finding a fair amount to appreciate. coming across as critical bc i’m choosing to grapple with the content i find discordant

but that’s kinda the main point, capital is always already nascent capital accumulation, and the valorization circuit of money->commodity->money+ inherent to generalized commodity production. i don’t see how one could enforce simple reproduction, especially without a state

though i’ll hold my tongue until i get through carson, i really am hopeful that he has something insightful to say