i feel like less of a person lately

i was gonna make a shitpost along the lines of “enough with ‘ontologically evil’, let’s try ‘epistemically evil’ for a while” but then i realized this has already basically been done by Putnam re: Rorty

once i dislodge the tumor making me terminally retarded i’ll stop being humiliated all the time

i still haven’t completed also my social reproduction tasks for the night sad

my mom hasn’t had a 401k this whole time you selfish whore some of us are looking to cash out when you croak

think of all the lost years of max annual roth contributions…. it’s enough to make a grown man cry

this thread is like 75% kidding

this is a self report you’re not a real gangsta of cyberspace

sometimes i have thoughts at 2am that are utterly undecipherable

i remember this was something about william james and religion but couldn’t tell you the details what was she cooking

these are fitting for disreputable reasons

i just don’t really wanna do this any more

i’m cry the concept of “preferred names” and their implementation in medical contexts is evil

i actually ended up going by myself one afternoon since it was free and i was curious after failing twice, it was kinda nice just to walk around and listen to music and look at things tho it’s defi not my scene and i haven’t been the slightest bit interested in reattending since

nvm i take it back this is adorable imagining you with a backpack with a picnic blanket inside

pretty sure at one point we did entertain the idea tho

i once invited a girl to go on an art museum date with me, she agreed with a smiley face, and then i got ghosted

looking into this

*foaming at the mouth* needneedneedneedneedne

juliet’s banner is what i imagine you two dming looking like

free time is perhaps a reasonable aspiration for wage slaves, but not for others

footnotes: nietzsche, geuss, adorno, postone, kurz, jappe, krisis and other anti-labor marxists

i would hang this up in my office but i fear it would make me cry too frequently

(the ethos of this section may seem at odds with post 1 but my aim is specifically to contrast “free time” with idleness or leisure [although leisure carries too much economistic bad air for me to be enthused about]. i appreciate that idleness could be the foil of the marxist sense of productive)

(as in a complete negation - not even instrumentally in service of productivity. but of course this does not rule out expression and creation - we may be our most active in our times of idleness! but who has been lucky enough to experience true idleness in the contemporary world?)

i’m built different (fragile)

“why did you vomit on me” what, girls can’t develop historically emerging ways of overcoming the alternative of slaughter or seduction anymore?

wow, kasey is really utilizing all of her powers and not limiting herself to domination-free conversation

btw i love footnote 19

do you ever think about how my brain is just an infinite regress of pointers to things i’ve seen

inb4 she tells me i’m using infinite regress wrong

why do you hate human progress and objective knowledge

bertrand russell >>> martin heidegger

in person p, mental state m gives rise to desire d1 that induces action a such that desire d2 is undermined

new vaguepost unlocked: write like you’re making an analytic philosophy paper

me and tea

🔒🔁

i didn’t spell this out yesterday but obviously the entire passage presupposes that vivisection is not only justified for humans to do, but even that the victim would accept vivisection if they were simply lectured to about its virtues. lol, blatantly ideological

i hate when zoomers are like that it always makes me say: no shot they don’t know my squad, george lucas the blud no 🧢 on a stack 💰frfr, if i’m keeping it a buck with you 💵

“we have lord of the rings at home”

person whose only expose to the fantasy genre is lord of the rings: getting real lord of the rings vibes from this

nonchalant NTR game night (with snacks)

oh and as a final word - the real issue is that religion in any form simply isn't a "live hypothesis" for me (to use james' jargon). that is of course unless you uses religion in the broad and empty supernatural sense that only the most ardent positivist would object instead of his other definition.

honestly even his most hollowed-out and non-committal versions are far too much for me

but james can't even appeal to the short term lol

you're having an affair with the secretary, how scandalous!

nietzsche's got u covered