Alt Text

willow

dreary.dev

did:plc:hx53snho72xoj7zqt5uice4u

andromorphic angel


one of my most stubborn bsky opinions is that i must remain comfortable posting on main. i waver sometimes but i want to be as vulnerable and open as i can be, for anyone interested enough to care.
1 replies
as i’ve accumulated more relationships, i’ve had to become more mindful of what i share. i’ve had to find ways of being transparent while respecting their desires for privacy. i’ve enjoyed developing this new type of discretionary judgement, although i don’t always get it right.
1 replies
the bluntness of old diary-posting probably isn’t really possible any longer; proper nouns are replaced with pronouns, untagged self-harm pics are replaced with implication, verbose contextualization is replaced with reliance on pre-existing familiarization that fits within 3-skeet threads.
1 replies
that’s not all bad, it’s fun in lots of ways to get accustomed to a new mode of communication and to explore its bounds. constraints are interesting. i think it’d be fun to go back to the old style for a week, though it’s unclear if i’m capable given the kind of values and habits i’ve internalized.
1 replies
it’s also unclear if it’s something i need any longer. the function bsky posting has served in my life has fluctuated a lot since i first joined, and to some extent the current state of things is the appropriate adaption to my circumstances. no matter what, i don’t want to allow myself to hide tho.

how does it feel to be so deliberate and intentional, only to be met with clumsy thoughtlessness?


it’s always 2 dumb bitches telling each other 🙂‍↔️
1 replies
(this one *is* a subskeet 🤍)

bless me father, for i am about to store stringified json
1 replies
related deep philosophical quandary: "does it make you gay if you do a gay thing intentionally knowing you're doing a gay thing, but you're just doing it to be funny?.... like what if you literally let yourself get blown by a dude"

i have every expectation that many of you will, it's mostly a matter of exposure

new(est) willow is hella playpilled but rn im just irked that you're the only one who can watch me dance between contexts without getting disoriented
1 replies
alternative metaphor: only one who can watch me crash my bike into a tree unflinchingly

its nice being inconsistent, i just wish more of you could consistently follow along

i know! it was good! i do genuinely mean that i already believed this, just that with my current social circle it doesnt make sense to speak aloud. ur basically the only person i could trust to get it lol

i knowwww and thats why i love him, just like to 99% of people i'd cringe and die if they said as much

unironically, tho it sounds memey/cope

never underestimate my ability to earnestly proclaim contradictory propositions in rapid succession

i might not be a doll but i sure am frail

smiling through gritted teeth until i blow my head off




babe stop sucking up to babe
1 replies
i need to implement a more effective union busting policy

🤦‍♀️ i was quoting babe babe

babe will you repost my art so i can be an awful little clout demon

This is a post by another user.

View in bsky.app


it’s so funny that i always say shit like this after laying out something that i retrospectively interpret as extremely profound
imsad
Feb 13, 2025 36:42
I can't do this thing. I'm actually like so unbelievably bad at analyzing myself. Like all of my diaries like this are completely fucking worthless because I'm actually like very, very, very poor at like understanding what's going on in me.
I'm trying. I'm failing a lot. Just nothing feels right.
Like there's elements of truth in

(i’ve really come around actually, they’re based as fuck)

i bite my tongue, it’s a bad habit
1 replies
i wish i knew you wanted me
1 replies
(TDKg2uB0jMo)

Raymond Geuss, Philosophy and Real Politics, pg 32

If one takes this extended Leninist model as the matrix for political philosophy, certain consequences would seem to follow. The first is that it would be a mistake to believe that one could come to any substantive understanding of politics by discussing abstractly the good, the right, the true, or the rational in complete abstraction from the way in which these items figure in the more motivationally active parts of the human psyche, and particularly in abstraction from the way in which they impinge, even if indirectly, on human action. This, in turn, requires an understanding of the existing social and political institutions. In politics "It would be good if ... (e.g., the tsar were overthrown)" means someone has decided that it would be desirable or advisable if this were to take place, or at any rate has entertained the possibility that this might be done. "Who is that?" is always a pertinent question. It also means that someone is in principle willing to try to implement "the good" that has been determined, even if the form that attempt at implementation takes is a series of weak and ineffectual actions that amount to no more than some seditious conversations, or committing to memory a subversive poem.13

See Nadezhda Mandelstamm’s Hope against Hope: A Memoir, trans. Max Hayward (Atheneum, 1970).

This is a post by another user.

View in bsky.app
1 replies
sorry buddy get back here

This is a post by another user.

View in bsky.app

one of the primary functions my quote posting serves is author-affirmation through pedigree
1 replies
“author” is intentionally ambiguous here between quotee and quoter (because it’s both). in the case of self-quoting, it is doubly self-affirmative
1 replies
lastly, note the modification to value-preservation
Raymond Geuss, “Nietzsche and Genealogy”, Morality, Culture, and History, pg 3.

One might think that this way of thinking (and especially characteristic 5) overlooks an important feature of pedigrees, namely that in certain cases the longer the pedigree - the further back it can be traced - the better, the greater the resultant valorization. A family that could trace its patent of nobility back to the 15th century might think that this pedigree showed it to be more noble than a family whose patent went back only to the 19th century. Two distinct thoughts run together in this. First, that what is older is better, i.e. a more genuine or more intense source of value, so that getting into contact with it is inherently desirable and it is just an accident that getting in touch with this source of value requires a large number of steps of succession. The second thought is that the increasing number of steps - the passage of time itself - enhances the prestige or value of the item in question: It isn't that the older is necessarily a better source of value than what is more recent, but the value increases through succession. This suggests that one should perhaps revise 5 to read: 
5*. by a series of steps that preserve or enhance whatever 
value is in question.

i’m looking forward to my drive tmrw

things i would no longer say: Why The Hell Is The Southern Tier North Of The Northern Tier
1 replies
everyday feels the same yesterday was this past month but this past month was today i dont get it, i never really did time never felt real; nothing feels like anything i thought it would be over soon but ive always just been waiting
1 replies

silly hypothetical inspired by discussion in this thread: platform that runs their own pds and creates new accounts for each user (rather than using existing accounts). removes the broader social identity component and therefore makes the "why" even more unclear, but that's the point :)
1 replies
kaseycoded convoluted metadata storage

there’s a lot to love here. the state of nature story with me as protagonist, the personification of abstractions, the dramatic flourishes, the casual oscillations of style, the walkthrough wrapping it all together. playful yet methodical, it was a pleasure to read. sincerely, The Reader :)

can you just get new ones?