Timeline - Replies (page 4)

i lied but not by much

“are you doing anything oct 21-26” “cool cya then”

alt text backfill

okay the evil people in my email box stopped sending me messages so i calmed down a bit

i’m so cool i love wren

youtu.be

wren x marric - matter over mind

YouTube video by wren

i like when he goes hexd-mode

this is an omen that my day will turn around

i want to not be irritated

😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

alright i’m about to crash out

and i’m not talking cunny

alright i’m about to crash out

if you’re going to open a dozen high prio issues in a day asking me to do your job for you, could you at least do me the decency of not having chatgpt write them for you

daniel stenberg give me strength to make it through this year

little moth, it’s gonna be okay

you don’t need a therapist, you need to listen to pre-transition chloe moriondo

youtu.be

little moth - chloe moriondo (official audio)

YouTube video by chloe moriondo

bleh thursday is lock in day

watched a stoicism influencer be like “you think you’re the first person to live through rough political times? people have always lived in shitty times, you gotta just focus up and do what’s in your control to make it through” and cited socrates as an example dawg they killed his ass wdym 😭

okay i got very sidetracked i should really go back to bed

i couldn’t resist listening to juliet and now look at me, an hour and a half later

lol i knew i liked this video a lot, there are so many fun things going on. this is exactly what i mean when i speak of my favorite genre of academic, someone with a lot of accumulated anecdotes and knowledge from their study

the myth of jewish horns and its origin, wisconsin being a part of the bible belt + its associated meaning of politeness, it’s just cute

“i’m kind of a hegelian in that way, it’s very out of fashion i know but *shrugs*” :)

“i couldn’t do that research today. my political dispositions haven’t changed along with the rest of the country, i’ve become more polarized and more extreme in my positions, and i couldn’t be as open-minded today, i’d be more offended”

“ideally you’d go in receptive instead of resentful. but because i’m aware of who funds which politics in this state and have seen such devastation, so up close in precisely the worlds i care about the most, im not in the right place to do something with people i consider hellbent on ruination”

“i do work on post-genocidal states, and i come from a place where people who commit genocide are understandable and explainable and can be forgiven and are people exactly like me. i have a much harder time right here right now because i live in this state”

“it’s a very unfair, immoral philosophical position i embrace” GANG SHIT QUEEN

“a lot of the time, you’re just sort of winging it”

oh my god i love her “the question you’re asking comes from a specific paradigm that values quantitative research over qualitative. the notion of bias as somehow skewing data comes out of number being impervious but human bias screwing with things”

“of course i believe in bias but it’s just the tissues and ligaments of social investigation”

like you get me

just like, imagine showing this paper to adorno and being like hey look i pointed out "bias", did i do a good ideology critique

youtube.com

Rossier Qualitative Speaker Series - Simone Schweber Talk

YouTube video by Eriq Felix

i respect simone schweber for her attempts to go against the grain, i'm not sure how successful she was

be careful what you write, other people might read it

lol this is cute

i’m not sure if it’s more embarrassing to fall for the claims made by an ai content mill or to seriously engage and debunk them

this is like 2017 libs earnestly combating propaganda

do you think its too late to swap to light beige instead

i'll try a splotch of it tmrw and see what i think

im gna lay down and go to bed early tn

can someone explain to me how foucault is shoved down the throat of everyone in academia and yet no one has read the guy

whatever this sucked. i'm bummed

Show full thread

lolllll i do love that scholarship on williams is like: "the BLD requires addressing the FPQ in a way that attends to the CTP, and this demonstrates that politics is a CNP"

i wish you were at least accidentally whimsical with him like the other guys, you leave it all implicit and its so ugly.

willowDec 13, 2024

just like, imagine showing this paper to adorno and being like hey look i pointed out "bias", did i do a good ideology critique

I SPOKE TOO SOON, FPQ MENTIONED

lol the first objection addressed and yea idk its just so not satisfying. frankly embarrassing that an anonymous reviewer had to bring it to your attention and even worse that you just parrot enzo's line

as in, we’re humans yea, and we do mean things to animal guys, yea. vicious circularity in justification real likely. but like there’s not a lot to really glean from that, because it’s not just likely or suspect there’s just no alternative. idk maybe paulo will prove me wrong, i imagine ill end up

like its fine? ish? but simply doesn't get us anywhere. the deck is just stacked in your favor because you said so. you're just giving the game away that you've decided ahead of time that the powerful are wrong. and yes, i will use the strong reading because there is no alternative to considering

them "wrong" when you count it as "debunking" and so unreliable as to be inadmissible. at least rossi et al cite some anthropology and history, this is just dorm room philosophy

i've checked out at this point. im not even gonna complain about this butchered mess of an argument for "criticism of the status quo". i'm not gonna whine about how fucking sloppy the evopsych trash is