fuuuuuck hes being so cool rn.
"there is no value-neutral definition of liberty"
"if there is one common thread to the argument of this book it is its critique of individualism and its endeavor to argue for a liberal morality on non-individualistic grounds"
"the argument of this book strives to rehabilitate the traditionalist affirmation of the value of freedom. but it accepts the revisionist arguments against both the presumption of liberty and the simple principle, as well as their critique of linguistic analysis.
in some ways my proposed defense of the traditional belief in the value of freedom is based on a radical departure from some historically central liberal doctrines."
i just have such a soft spot in my heart for people who throw away all of the intellectual scaffolding that would regularly arrive at their conclusions
good analysis that authority is not merely defacto authority, there is some normative justificatory core to the concept, whether or not that project succeeds is a separate question
"the case for the validity of a claim to authority must include justificatory considerations sufficient to outweigh counter-reasons. that is one reason why the case is hard to make.
but if anarchists are right to think that it can never be made, this is for contingent reasons and not because of any inconsistency in the notion of a rational justification for authority, nor in the notion of authority over moral agents"
for my brand of anarchism this is no real objection at all because thats not the kind of claim against authority i make, but for philosophical anarchism (a la robert paul wolff) it is a more pressing issue. i think it probably doesn't take the deontic considerations clearly enough
"One also has to take notice of the disadvantages to one's life of too obsessive a preoccupation with questions of the precise limits of authority." WE LOVE A GRILL PILLED QUEEN
i think i might take break tonight heading into anti-perfectionism. i'm not at ease with the consent sections but i'm withholding judgement to see what he can do with his conception
random thing i wanna throw out there from reading raz, i think theres a ton of benefit from reading oppressively mid authors. if you only hit up "the greats" in standard curricula you lack the cultivation of a bullshit detector and miss out on the enjoyment of well-formed thoughts
unfortunately "the greats" are usually mid as hell so undergrads aren't completely deprived, however its a different kind of mid from a grad student phoning it in
lmao im peeping the toc rn and its just so opposite of my vibe. not sure why i'm doing this but i feel like i'll be the most sympathetic rn ill ever be
all my friends mean so much to me and it’s hard to disambiguate the feelings, there are these swirling waves and glimpses of experiences and associations that emerge and fall back into the swell again and again
it’s a very roundabout way to get there. the proximate thing is that i’m (for some inexplicable reason) exposing myself to more contemporary political content and its hopelessly dour and sad and hateful. the world is trying to make me a raz liberal, i just hate cruelty right now
i’m so much more sensitive now, and my sphere of concern is so much tighter and more concrete. i don’t know if it’s a regression before or a progression beyond the enlightenment, probably a little of both