she just puts her nuts on the table she doesn’t give a fuck (but also she shoulda read rorty rip)

forgot i read about her a bit and thought she had some based moments

obvi she’s a lil wacky too lol but i forgot how soy this dissertation was

in any case iirc i thought she was the most promising and interesting of the authors presented, although philosophically and politically a bit muddled

(i think she’s wrong about lesbians but still, “lesbians are not women” goes so hard)

i’m just gonna take your word for it bc there’s no way i’m reading that shit

well let’s be real, neither are you :P

girl who absolutely isn’t taking creative liberties with interpretation and is a very faithful textualist

did dworkin wanna trans all the dudes??

like are we bumping uglies or starting a book club 🤣

gatekeeping sex from your boyfriend with a book report on classic feminist texts until he’s no longer interested

(it’s got a double meaning, because he either quits because it’s not worth the effort, or she’s a genuine convert and realizes the error of her ways)

there will be no issues as long as i have unmitigated access to pleasure you as i see fit (male entitlement to women’s bodies, wokely)

^-^ i figured it wasn’t intentional and it makes it all the more endearing hehehe

aaaaaa flushed flushed flushed you’re so pretty i love your smile

throat goat sloppy toppy gluck master 3000 deluxe (nonsexual)

i am going to mail unspecifiable objects to tim cook’s residence

uh oh juliet’s been awake too long she’s beginning to have delusions again

this is pathetic we’re both such bottoms for some frenchie get a grip you simp losers :3

i meannn i’m like 6.25-6.75 max maybe if we detached it from the rest of my body it’d be more fair

mogged by silicon this is so sad

eeeeee :3 julietttttt >.<

call me france the way i’m waving this white flag you win you win just dom me already

haven’t you heard of the paradox of tolerance? karl popper would be so disappointed with the state of the modern left…

if the intolerant left won’t accept me, i’ll forge my own path #MGTOW

it’s unlucky that trans sage beat me to the bit and is doing it better

maybe it’s gay for you i’m #SuperStraight

i’m just kidding juli!!! i’ll let you stick a baguette up my ass or whatever you frogs get freaky with

me doing warmed over platonism: hehehe i’m so play pilled ^_^

theory of the forms, pragmatically

doubt at least in canada they’ll be like ooo i’m gonna dump syrup over you and i’m not even gonna say sOorrey what’s france got on that? methinks it all a bluff

smh now she’s claiming post modernism new thread planned on friday to address this

just call yourself a philosophical pragmatist and you can mental gymnastics yourself into and out of any position it’s based

downside: you might have to read enough dewey to drop a few conversation sound bites to appear like you know what you’re talking abt

nothing is new under the sun and i have remarkably narrow taste in women

if you come have sex with us you will receive salvation from the femcel cult its like baptism but less gay

can’t an ace girl and her girlboyfriend have celibate sex anarcha-feministly anymore without the femcel woke brigade coming after us

NL: i don’t know why you even bothered to post online about this before doing the obvious resolution path like literally everyone has their brain fried

for the record by the way,,,, i was vindicated for this call

okay chat she’s literally lying dud you all know i’m incel gang 4 lyfe

i called her immediately and we just hung up now !! i love her 🥺

for the chat: we had a loving lil pow wow and now we’re purrfect meow

sorryyyyy luv uuuuu mwah mwah 😚

and with 1-3, i'm not sure why we turn rejection into an identity. here's a very short piece that i find insightful and think might be helpful (you haven't read lacan, but you've read stirner, so you'll be mostly fine)

here's a passage i've been thinking about, but mostly for its inapplicability. you say your use of the term is idiosyncratic, and ofc i agree, but i don't think your motivations are idiosyncratic, or detached/isolated at all, and are fairly definite, consistent, and are continuously situated

the opposite in fact - they are consequences of other very dearly held positions (see above). however, rather than clarifying anything, i think the subsumption obfuscates the value and truth in those particularistic analyses

ofc, "clarity" need not be the goal, but see above for my approach to a more enlightening motivational attitude (esp rorty passage)

motivational contexts come prior to rationality, and imo your motivations are overdetermined, and the conditionally applied rationality is unnecessary, and i would argue a hinderance on both your analysis and your orientation in the world

alright thats p much it, ily lots hope ur doing goooood ily uwu