swag

i’d definitely prefer it to be separate. you could always layer on bsky post integration by having an option to post a thread when you make a review

it’s humiliating. it’s gotten so bad that i have to click “load more” in pdsls.

freaking soap is such a gold digger

you cooked with this one boss

are you denying her lived experience?

i think i gotta stop engaging w christian bloomfs, im getting too much secondhand embarrassment

it’s fun as like a little model train toy world but it gets a little sad when they get all ardent and preachy

yeah i maybe need to stop using such brute shorthand to describe things (“selfish”) this passage is kinda v uncompelling to me tho, yay on the anti-liberalism, nay on the christian ethics

hahaha i knew you’d poke this too, i meant it as shorthand but you’re right

me too, but in a selfish and non-religious way

yeayea okie that’s what i thought your take would be swag

sure but wouldn’t that be like kinda scuffed? like do you think it’s like an actual possibility for god actions to deviate from the good? or is it more like in this hypothetical it would be unjust, and that’s all the more reason to reject the universalist reading because that’s impossible

hahaha that’s awesome :>

pregnant_neocat

🥺 sorry

sure but like in this alt universe of universalist god that we’re saying is unjust, if Good and god are one and the same, by what yard stick could you measure god to be unjust?

yea this was mostly a way to bait my christian homies to give their takes bc i was curious :3

i dub this phenomenon the aly oop (emphasis on the oop) you set me up perfectly and i blunder it away

your posts would be such bangers if i wasn’t so hopelessly autistic

i meant to clarify last night but got distracted, i more meant to ask why the god would be unjust/evil tho it makes sense that if you have an independent notion of justice/moral-whatever that leaving evil unpunished or treating it as equal with goodness would be unjust itself

euthyphro says hi but i don’t think it’s that big of an issue to say something similar to “the god i believe in would judge that state of affairs to be unjust” and call it a day

i’d probably be more concerned with that response if the textual evidence for the position didn’t seem so weak

everyone goes to heaven (eventually - some people spend a bit in purgatory first)

freaking soap

☹️kant☹️

christian universalism, like everyone goes to heaven (why i summoned theology bloomfs)

i’m very sorry mr jonas 🫡

kinda hard and not viable unfortunately (soap tried this early-days and was the reason rate limits got introduced). tho you can use blockenheimer to block a users following/followers, so that would be pretty straightforward if you chose a couple big accounts in our circle blockenheimer.click

i’ve never used but i’m pretty sure it generates a modlist and you can (un)subscribe and remove/add accounts as needed

can you expand on unjust/evil?

thank you! i’ll check it out ty

universalism is obviously massive copium right

tagging @thecoalbaker.bsky.social @yabaisato.obviously.moe @cwonus.org (?) @ theology bloomfs

biracial cat biracial cat

slug is the luigi of FOSS

would be fun seeing the gender breakdown of days OOO with this policy, i’m sure there would be no noticeable shenanigans whatsoever

🔁 🔁 🔁 and also

i think it’s okay to be frustrated with decisions that open source maintainers make. yeah you can fork and maintain your own but sometimes that’s like a lot man

oh yea i got what you were saying hehe, was just explaining why i wasn’t personally motivated to look into that project

yea absolutely, tbh i haven’t done a ton of reading on the subject bc it’s mostly super boring to me. nietzsche/feuerbach get it right when they say the questions only arise for the weak

not that i’m not weak, moreso that once one notices that basic structure it’s difficult to actually believe, and the comfort wouldn’t work properly

listening to Being as an Ocean again

i'm kinda nostalgiac for the time gail and i took a break

this is very much related to yesterday's post. i desperately want to hit rock bottom - for its own sake, not for the implied rebound.

okay i’ve been using it and it’s alright, still slightly awkward but mostly fine

i get it tho idk

still less irritating than the thought-terminating 12x re-digested foucault cliffnotes that constitutes the zoomer baseline